Moment of Inertia of a Right Triangle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a thin, uniform right triangle sign about its height. The initial attempt involved converting the integral into terms of radius, but the user struggled with expressing density in terms of mass and area. A correction was made regarding the relationship between the triangle's dimensions and the integration process. After refining the equation for height based on the triangle's geometry, the final correct moment of inertia was determined to be 1/6 Mb². The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately setting up the integral and understanding the geometric relationships involved.
fajoler
Messages
11
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A metal sign for a car dealership is a thin, uniform right triangle with base length b and height h. The sign has mass m. What is the moment of inertia of the sign for rotation about the side of length h?




Homework Equations



I = \intr^{2}dm





The Attempt at a Solution




Alright so I started off by trying to convert the integral so that it is in terms of dr rather than dm. So, I calculated that dm = \rho dA.

then from there, the integral can be written as I = \ointr^{2}\rho(h/b)rdr


A little bit of simplifying will give us I = \intr^{3}\rho(h/b)dr

bounded from 0 to b.

If we solve the integral, we get I = (1/4)b^{4}\rho(h/b) - 0


Which we can simplify further to I = (1/4)b^{3}\rhoh



The only problem is, the question asks for I to be in terms of the given values, so I have to somehow change \rho into something in terms of b, h, and m. I'm not sure how to do this though because a 2D object shouldn't even have density, should it?



Thanks for the help!
 
  • Like
Likes Mitchel Haas
Physics news on Phys.org
It has mass and area, so it has density = mass/area = m/(.5bh).

I fear you may have a mistake in the early stage where you have not shown enough detail for me to follow. I made a diagram showing a "slice" of the triangle at x, part way between x=0 and b along the base. The slice is trapezoidal but can be safely approximated as a rectangle. It's area dA = y*dx where y is the height of the slice. I think your r is my x. Tricky little relationship between y and x; I guess it is the formula for the line forming the hypotenuse. If I were you I would write out those steps carefully to make sure you have the right expression before integrating.
 
so y = mx + b and we can calculate that y = (-h/b) x assuming the point of rotation is aligned at the origin right?which means dA = (-h/b) x dxNow since r is the distance from the origin, or the point of rotation, can we say that r is equal to x and dx is equal to dr?then now that we know that density = mass/area, density equals mass/(0.5*b*h) right?
This is how I derived my integral for Inertia, but it gives me the wrong answer. What did I do wrong?
By the way the answer I got was
I = 1/2 M b^2
 
Last edited:
so y = mx + b and we can calculate that y = (-h/b) x assuming the point of rotation is aligned at the origin right?
It says "rotation about the side of length h" so it seems to me that at x = 0, we must have y = h. At x = b, y = 0. If you plug those two points into y = mx + b, you'll get a different and more complex formula for y.
 
  • Like
Likes Mitchel Haas
ah youre right.so would the equation for y then be y = -(h/b)x + h?If I use this as my equation for y, and plug it into the integral for inertia, I come up with an answer of 1/6 Mb^2.this is the correct answer. thanks for walking me through this problem. I greatly appreciate it!
 
Most welcome!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top