MHB Moment of Inertia: Use Parallel Axis Theorem

AI Thread Summary
To determine the moment of inertia of a uniform disc about the x-axis using the parallel axis theorem, one must first calculate the moment of inertia about the center of the disc. The parallel axis theorem states that the moment of inertia about any axis parallel to one through the center of mass can be found by adding the moment of inertia about the center of mass to the product of the mass and the square of the distance between the two axes. For a uniform disc, the moment of inertia about the center is (1/2)MR², and the distance from the center to the edge is R. Therefore, the moment of inertia about the x-axis is (1/2)MR² + MR², resulting in (3/2)MR².
Peter Gikonyo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Use a parallel axis theorem to determine the moment of inertia of a uniform disc of mass M and radius R about the x-axis perpendicular to the plane of the disc and passing at the edge of the disc.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB! :D

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top