Momentum and Kinetic Energy of stationary ball collision

AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision between a moving ball of mass m and a stationary ball of larger mass, the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy are crucial. When the mass of the stationary ball decreases slightly, the center of mass (CM) velocity increases, allowing the stationary ball to gain more kinetic energy post-collision. The moving ball, which comes to rest when masses are equal, now has a non-zero velocity, resulting in an increase in its kinetic energy as well. The analysis can be simplified geometrically or solved algebraically using the conservation equations. Overall, a slight decrease in the mass of the stationary ball leads to a greater increase in kinetic energy for both balls after the collision.
chrizzle
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
if a ball of mass, m is traveling at v and it hits a stationary ball that is a much larger mass (ignoring air resistance, friction etc.) through algebra how would you show that when the mass of the stationary ball decreases slightly, the total kinetic energy that the stationary ball gains after the collision increases. (it is assumed that it is an elastic collision ie. kinetic energy is conserved)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write down the equations of both cases and divide them like in a two equations 2 unknowns gig. Might work in this case.
 
It is important to remember the following to understand this solution to the question.
1. We take into consideration, the conservation of momentum, besides kinetic energy (KE) conservation.
2. We assume the collision to be 1D collision; ie, it is a head-on collision and NOT an oblique collision. This assumption avoids the complications that are associated with elastic scatter process, which is not same as elastic collision process.
3. In the center of mass(CM) reference frame, the velocity of CM is zero. each mass changes the sign of its velocity (but not magnitude), after the collision thereby conserving its KE.
4. In the laboratory reference frame (where one of the masses is at rest before collision), CM moves with a velocity equal in magnitude and opposite in sign to that of the velocity with which the mass at rest would move when the collision is viewed in CM frame. (This gives the reason why the mass at rest appears to be at rest in the laboratory frame).

Now the answer to the question:

When the body (say, m2), at rest before collision decreases its mass slightly, the velocity of CM increases slightly (compared to the value it had when the masses were equal), in order that m2 appears to be at rest.

After the collision the velocity of CM remains the same. Velocity of the mass m2 increases (compared to the value it had after the collision when the masses were equal); consequently, KE of m2 increases when its mass decreases.

The other body, (m1) (which came to rest(zero velocity) after the collision when the masses were equal) moves with a non-zero velocity. Consequently, its KE also increases compared to the value it had (zero) when the masses were equal).

The solution is very simple in the geometrical form (and is due to Huygens). The algebraic solution can be obtained by solving the equations of conservation of mass, momentum and KE.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top