God Plays Dice
- 79
- 0
I also used the relativistic equations and they give the same non compliance
There si no point to repeat. The second method is not valid.God Plays Dice said:Yes. I take the sum of all the particles in terms of momentum, ie their mass X vel and then divide thru by mass of the craft. I'm sure this is correct. Then I take the sum of all the particles 0.5 mass X vel^2. And rearrange this equation to find vel of the craft plugging in mass of craft. When the vel of the particles is very high then the KE vel is much higher than the momentum vel. When the vel of the particles is quite slow I get a KE vel slower than momentum vel. Do the excel sheet yourself it takes only a couple of minutes just plug any mass values in and do a range of particle velocities youl get non compliant KE vel with p vel.
God Plays Dice said:But how can something have a velocity that's described by its momentum, and at the same time not have the required KE for the job?
at that magnitude dp/dt =mdv/dt + vdm/dt i.e ma + vdm/dt.God Plays Dice said:Hi all,
I have charged particles (protons) accelerated by an electric field. If I add up all the momentum and find the change in momentum per sec I can find the acceleration of my craft by
dp/dt /M = a
If I add up all the kinetic energy of the particles and find the KE per sec, I can find the acceleration by
Sqrt (KE/t /0.5*M) = a
They are both similar calcs but give wildly different values. KE calc is 10^9 bigger.
So which is it? KE or p to find acceleration?