More Evidence for MOND -- Globular cluster galactic acceleration imprint

  • B
  • Thread starter ohwilleke
  • Start date
  • #1
ohwilleke
Gold Member
2,445
1,431
Not about wide binary stars, but another new paper with evidence for MOND or a MOND-like theory:

[Submitted on 16 Aug 2023]

The galactic acceleration scale is imprinted on globular cluster systems of early-type galaxies of most masses and on red and blue globular cluster subpopulations​

Michal Bílek, Michael Hilker, Florent Renaud, Tom Richtler, Avinash Chaturvedi, Srdjan Samurović
Context. Globular clusters carry information about the formation histories and gravitational fields of their host galaxies. Bílek et al. (2019, BSR19 hereafter) reported that the radial profiles of volume number density of GCs in GC systems (GCS) follow broken power laws, while the breaks occur approximately at the a0 radii. These are the radii at which the gravitational fields of the galaxies equal the galactic acceleration scale a0=1.2×10−10ms−2 known from the radial acceleration relation or the MOND theory of modified dynamics.
Aims. Our main goals here are to explore whether the results of BSR19 hold true for galaxies of a wider mass range and for the red and blue GCs sub-populations.
Methods. We exploited catalogs of photometric GC candidates in the Fornax galaxy cluster based on ground and space observations and a new catalog of spectroscopic GCs of NGC 1399, the central galaxy of the cluster. For every galaxy, we obtained the parameters of the broken power law density by fitting the on-sky distribution of the GC candidates, while allowing for a constant density of contaminants. The logarithmic stellar masses of our galaxy sample span 8.0-11.4 M⊙.
Results. All investigated GCSs with a sufficient number of members show broken power-law density profiles. This holds true for the total GC population and the blue and red subpopulations. The inner and outer slopes and the break radii agree well for the different GC populations. The break radii agree with the a0 radii typically within a factor of two for all GC color subpopulations. The outer slopes correlate better with the a0 radii than with the galactic stellar masses. The break radii of NGC 1399 vary in azimuth, such that they are greater toward and against the neighboring galaxy NGC 1404.
Comments:39 pages, ~15 pages main text, 33 figures, 12 tables. Accepted for publication in A&A
Subjects:Astrophysics of Galaxies (astro-ph.GA)
Cite as:arXiv:2308.08629 [astro-ph.GA]
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
(or arXiv:2308.08629v1 [astro-ph.GA] for this version)This new paper by Bílek et al. provides further evidence for MOND or a MOND-like theory by examining the distribution of globular clusters in galaxies of various masses and subpopulations. The results show that the density profiles of globular clusters follow broken power laws, with the breaks occurring at the a0 radii, which is consistent with the predictions of MOND. This is an important confirmation of previous studies and expands the evidence for MOND to a wider range of galaxies.

One interesting finding is the variation in azimuth of the break radii of NGC 1399, which suggests that the gravitational fields of neighboring galaxies may also play a role in the distribution of globular clusters. This adds another layer of complexity to the understanding of MOND and the role of gravity in galaxy formation and evolution.

Overall, this paper provides strong support for MOND or a MOND-like theory, and further research in this area will continue to shed light on the nature of gravity and its effects on galaxy dynamics.
 

Related to More Evidence for MOND -- Globular cluster galactic acceleration imprint

What is MOND and how does it differ from dark matter theories?

MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) is a hypothesis that proposes a modification to Newton's laws to account for the observed properties of galaxies. Unlike dark matter theories, which suggest that an unseen form of matter is responsible for the gravitational effects observed in galaxies, MOND modifies the laws of gravity at very low accelerations to explain these effects without invoking dark matter.

What evidence does the study provide to support MOND over dark matter?

The study provides evidence by examining the dynamics of globular clusters and their galactic acceleration. The findings suggest that the observed accelerations of these clusters are consistent with predictions made by MOND, rather than those expected if dark matter were the dominant force. This includes specific patterns in the motion and distribution of the clusters that align more closely with MOND's predictions.

Why are globular clusters important for testing theories of gravity?

Globular clusters are important because they are relatively simple systems composed of old stars, and their dynamics can be precisely measured. Their motions within a galaxy can provide clear tests of gravitational theories. Since they are less affected by other galactic processes compared to more complex systems, they serve as clean laboratories to test the predictions of MOND versus dark matter.

What specific predictions of MOND were confirmed by the study?

The study confirmed several specific predictions of MOND, including the relationship between the internal velocity dispersion of globular clusters and their external galactic acceleration. MOND predicts a distinct pattern in this relationship that differs from what would be expected if dark matter were the primary influence, and the observations matched these MOND predictions closely.

What are the implications of this study for the future of astrophysics?

The implications of this study are significant as they provide more evidence that challenges the dark matter paradigm. If MOND continues to be supported by further observations, it could lead to a major shift in our understanding of gravity and the fundamental laws of physics. It also encourages the scientific community to explore alternative theories and models that might better explain the dynamics of celestial objects without invoking dark matter.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
757
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top