I More information on the momentum eigenstate in the position basis

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter hmparticle9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum mechanics
hmparticle9
Messages
151
Reaction score
26
The following sentence appears in my book (Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths (3rd Edition)) :

"## \langle x | p \rangle ## is the momentum eigenstate (with eigenvalue p) in the position basis." Page 122.

I am not sure why this is the case. I have done some digging... on a previous page (114) it says

"The momentum space wave function ##\Phi(p ,t)## is the ##p## component in the expansion of ## | S(t) \rangle ## in the basis of momentum eigenfunctions:
$$\Phi(p ,t) = \langle p | S(t) \rangle$$
(with ## | p \rangle ## standing for the eigenfunction of ##\hat{p}## with eigenvalue ##p##)"

So is it convention that ## | p \rangle ## is the eigenfunction/eigenstate of ##\hat{p}##? If that is the case then that is one problem solved.

The second problem is, why does application of ## \langle x|## to ## | p \rangle ## mean that we are taking ##| p \rangle## with respect to the position basis?

From doing some further reading it seems as though that my second question could have the same answer as the first.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The text inside a ket is merely a label, so in general we need to know what convention is being used to assign labels to know what is meant by ##|whatever\rangle##.

There are some conventions that are so commonly used and generally accepted that authors often won't bother stating them explicitly. You've just figured two of them out: unless the context tells us otherwise, ##|p\rangle## is usually the eigenket of ##\hat{p}## with eigenvalue ##p## and likewise for ##|x\rangle## and ##\hat{x}##.

The expression ##\langle x|\psi\rangle## is a number, so for a fixed ##|\psi\rangle## and variable ##x## it maps values of ##x## to numbers - which makes it a function of ##x##, the position-space representation of ##|\psi\rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes hmparticle9 and PeroK
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
607
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
515
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top