Most probable macrostates of two Einstein solids

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yuriick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Solids
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the most probable macrostate of two Einstein solids, A and B, with differing energy units and given oscillator counts. The total energy is set at 100 ε_A, leading to the equation q_A + 2q_B = 100. The multiplicity of each solid is expressed using formulas for Ω_A and Ω_B, which depend on the energy partitions q_A and q_B. The most probable macrostate is determined by maximizing entropy, leading to the solutions q_A = 200/3 and q_B = 50/3. The thread concludes with a successful resolution of the problem.
Yuriick
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider two Einstein solid A and B with N_{A} = 200 and N_{B} = 100. Suppose now that the oscillations of solids A and B are different. The energies of oscillators in solid A are measured in units of ε_{A}, so that the energy of solid A is U_{A} = q_{A} ε_{A}. Likewise, for solid B, the energy is U_{B} = q_{B} \epsilon_{B}. Assume that ε_{A} = 2ε_{B}, and that the total energy is 100 ε_{A}. Compute most probable macrostate

(Hint: to do this, you should write multiplicity/entropy of each solid and will have to and if/where one needs to take into account the fact that the units of energy of the two solids are different).


Homework Equations



(1) Sterlings approximation: \ln n! = n\ln n - n

(2) Multiplicity: Ω = \frac{(q+N-1)!}{(q)!(N-1)!}
There another forumla that says
(3) Ω = (\frac{eq}{N})^{N}

The Attempt at a Solution




U_{Total} = U_{A} + U_{B} = q_{A} ε_{A} + q_{B} ε_{B} = 100 ε_{A}
or
q_{A} ε_{A} + 2 q_{B} ε_{A} = 100 ε_{A}
q_{A} + 2 q_{B} = 100

This means that for each Ω_{A}(q_{A}) microstates of energy q_{A}, there are Ω_{B}(50 -\frac{q_{A}}{2}) microstates accesible to B.

The total microstate for partition of energy q_{A}, q_{B} is
Ω_{A}(q_{A})Ω_{B}(q_{B})

So the we can use (3),
Ω_{A}(q_{A})Ω_{B}(q_{B}) = (\frac{e q_{A}}{N_{A}})^{N_{A}} <br /> (\frac{e(50 - \frac{q_{A}}{2})}{\frac{N_{A}}{2}})^{\frac{N_{A}}{2}}<br /> <br />


I have no idea if what I'm doing is right. Any insight would be really appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Figured it out. For anyone who finds this thread:
Once you have Ω_{A} and Ω_{B}
Use

S = kln(Ω_{A}) +kln(Ω_{B})

Then we know that the most probable macrostate is when,

\frac{δS}{δq_{A}} = 0

So just solve for q_{A},then use it to solve for q_{B}.

I got
q_{A} = \frac{200}{3}
q_{B} = \frac{50}{3}
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top