Motion of box on inclined plane connected by spring to a wall

In summary, when the system is in motion for the first time, the force causing m to move is a contact force with M. The acceleration of m is found to be vertically downwards and towards the left with respect to the ground, and down the slope with respect to M. The equation ΣF=ma can be used to determine the mass's acceleration in the ground frame, with the addition of the equation ##\vec a_m = \vec a_{mw} + \vec a_w## to find the component of ##\vec a_{mw}## normal to the wedge. The direction of ##\vec a_{mw}## is downwards parallel to the slope, resulting in a zero normal component. The direction of ##\vec
  • #1
songoku
2,384
351
Homework Statement
See the picture below. Initially, the system is at rest. Neglecting friction and mass of both spring and string,
a) what is initial acceleration of M? Assume initially the spring is at natural length ##L_1##
b) find the tension when the system moves for the first time
c) is total energy of system conserved?
d) after moving a distance ##x_o## towards the wall, M will stop. Find ##x_o##
e) find the equilibrium point of M, measured from initial position of M, when M oscillates
f) find the period of oscillation of system
Relevant Equations
∑F = m.a

Restoring force: F = k.x

ω = 2π / T
1616816139208.png


a) When the system is in motion for the first time, the force causing ##M## to move is contact force with ##m## so:
$$\Sigma F=M.a$$
$$N \sin \alpha=M.a$$
$$mg \cos \alpha \sin \alpha =M.a$$
$$a=\frac{mg \cos \alpha \sin \alpha}{M}$$

Is that correct?

b) Is acceleration of ##m## the same as ##M## when the system moves for the first time?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Are you sure N=mg cos(α)? If so, in which direction will m accelerate in the ground frame? Which direction is that relative to M?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #3
haruspex said:
Are you sure N=mg cos(α)?
Based on free body diagram (taking x-axis parallel to the slope of inclined plane), I think so

If so, in which direction will m accelerate in the ground frame? Which direction is that relative to M?
With respect to ground frame, ##m## will accelerate down the plane and ##M## to the right. With respect to ##M##, I think ##m## will also accelerate down the slope.

Or maybe my imagination is wrong? Actually with respect to ground, ##m## is accelerating vertically downwards and with respect to ##M##, ##m## is accelerating down the plane?

Thanks
 
  • #4
songoku said:
Based on free body diagram (taking x-axis parallel to the slope of inclined plane), I think so
The FBD gives you the forces, but the equation is ΣF=ma. You are assuming m has no component of acceleration (in the ground frame) normal to the plane.
songoku said:
With respect to ground frame, m will accelerate down the plane and M to the right. With respect to M, I think m will also accelerate down the slope.
How can those three be true simultaneously?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #5
haruspex said:
The FBD gives you the forces, but the equation is ΣF=ma. You are assuming m has no component of acceleration (in the ground frame) normal to the plane.

How can those three be true simultaneously?

I am not sure. Is there a certain way to determine the direction of acceleration of ##m## with respect to ground and relative to ##M##?

Thanks
 
  • #6
songoku said:
I am not sure. Is there a certain way to determine the direction of acceleration of ##m## with respect to ground and relative to ##M##?

Thanks
How much further down the sloped roof could this worker go? :smile:

aa9d7474caf19eb5877a11e0d%2F0318jlcbackfill-web-01.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and Delta2
  • #7
songoku said:
I am not sure. Is there a certain way to determine the direction of acceleration of ##m## with respect to ground and relative to ##M##?

Thanks
If the wedge has acceleration ##\vec a_w## and the mass has acceleration ##\vec a_{mw}## relative to the wedge, what is the mass's acceleration in the ground frame?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #8
Lnewqban said:
How much further down the sloped roof could this worker go? :smile:

View attachment 280370
All the way to the bottom of the slope? Sorry I don't really understand how to answer that question

haruspex said:
If the wedge has acceleration ##\vec a_w## and the mass has acceleration ##\vec a_{mw}## relative to the wedge, what is the mass's acceleration in the ground frame?
##\vec a_m = \vec a_{mw} + \vec a_w##
 
  • #9
songoku said:
All the way to the bottom of the slope? Sorry I don't really understand how to answer that question
Yes, sorry.
I was just trying to tell you that there is no much freedom for the mass m to move away from the wall because the string, even if the pulley attached to mass M moves as far to the right as the spring allows M to move.

Why would M move against the resistance of the spring?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #10
songoku said:
##\vec a_m = \vec a_{mw} + \vec a_w##
Ok, so what equation can you write for the component of ##\vec a_{mw}## normal to the wedge?
What equation relates N and mg to the component of ##\vec a_m## normal to the wedge?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #11
Lnewqban said:
Why would M move against the resistance of the spring?
Because there is contact force with ##m## that pushes ##M## to the right

haruspex said:
Ok, so what equation can you write for the component of ##\vec a_{mw}## normal to the wedge?
What equation relates N and mg to the component of ##\vec a_m## normal to the wedge?
Should I first need to know the direction of ##\vec a_{mw}## and ##\vec a_m## to be able to answer this question?

Thanks
 
  • #12
songoku said:
Because there is contact force with ##m## that pushes ##M## to the rightShould I first need to know the direction of ##\vec a_{mw}## and ##\vec a_m## to be able to answer this question?

Thanks
For my first question , does the mass lose contact with the wedge? Bury itself into the wedge? No? So what equation can you write for the component of ##\vec a_{mw}## normal to the wedge?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #13
haruspex said:
For my first question , does the mass lose contact with the wedge? Bury itself into the wedge? No? So what equation can you write for the component of ##\vec a_{mw}## normal to the wedge?
I am not sure. I imagine the direction of ##\vec a_{mw}## is downwards parallel to the slope so the component of ##\vec a_{mw}## normal to the wedge is zero
 
  • #14
songoku said:
I am not sure. I imagine the direction of ##\vec a_{mw}## is downwards parallel to the slope so the component of ##\vec a_{mw}## normal to the wedge is zero
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #15
haruspex said:
What equation relates N and mg to the component of ##\vec a_m## normal to the wedge?
Is the direction of ##\vec a_m## vertically downwards?

Thanks
 
  • #16
If you observe the geometry of the string, you could see that:
1) The length of the RH portion of the string is reduced in the same magnitude that M moves towards the right.
2) The length of the LH portion of the string is increased in the same magnitude that M moves towards the right (because of 1 above); therefore, m slides down the slope and away from the pulley respect to M.

I believe that, respect to the ground, m moves downwards and towards the left as the spring gets compressed.

There is a reaction at the axis of the pulley due to the tension of the string, but perhaps its horizontal component is not significant enough to include it in the solution of this problem.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #17
songoku said:
Is the direction of ##\vec a_m## vertically downwards?

Thanks
Only if M=0.

Let me start again, laying out what I hope is a simpler path, working in scalars.
Let the acceleration of M be a.
Find a simple kinematic equation relating amw (which we know is parallel to the slope) to a.
Let the horizontal and vertical accelerations of m in the ground frame be ax, ay.
Write out the ΣF=ma equations in those directions. These will involve N, T and mg.
Write the horizontal ΣF=ma equation for M.

We need two more equations. These express ax, ay in terms of a, amw.
See how far you can get.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #18
Lnewqban said:
I believe that, respect to the ground, m moves downwards and towards the left as the spring gets compressed.
You mean the direction of acceleration of m with respect to ground is parallel to the slope?

haruspex said:
Let the acceleration of M be a.
Find a simple kinematic equation relating amw (which we know is parallel to the slope) to a.
You mean amw = am - a , where am is acceleration of m with respect to ground?

Thanks
 
  • #19
songoku said:
You mean amw = am - a , where am is acceleration of m with respect to ground?

Thanks
No, just involving those two accelerations. Assume the whole string length is constant.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #20
Lnewqban said:
respect to the ground, m moves downwards and towards the left
Whether it is left or right depends on α.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and Lnewqban
  • #21
haruspex said:
No, just involving those two accelerations. Assume the whole string length is constant.
Is it:

a = - amw cos α ?

Thanks
 
  • #22
songoku said:
Is it:

a = - amw cos α ?

Thanks
I gave you the hint to think about string length. If the wedge moves a distance x towards the wall, what happens to the length of string from the pulley to the mass?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #23
haruspex said:
I gave you the hint to think about string length. If the wedge moves a distance x towards the wall, what happens to the length of string from the pulley to the mass?
I tried to use that hint and also what Lnewqban posted in #16 but apparently I did not use it correctly.

When the wedge moves a distance x towards the wall, the pulley will also move as far as x towards the wall hence the length of string from the pulley to the wall decreases by x, so the length of string from the pulley to the mass increases by x since the total length should stay constant.

From there, I thought since ##a## is to the right and ##a_{mw}## is down the slope and the distance traveled by the mass and the wedge is the same, the magnitude of ##a## and ##a_{mw}## would be the same and I tried to find the component of ##a_{mw}## which is parallel to ##a##, hence ##a_{mw} \cos \alpha## directed to the left

Edit: Ah I see my mistake, ##|a|## is the same as ##|a_{mw}|## but is not the same as ##|a_{mw} \cos \alpha|## as ##|a_{mw} \cos \alpha|## will be less than ##a##

So the equation will be ##|a|=|a_{mw}|## ?

Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #24
songoku said:
So the equation will be |a|=|amw| ?
Yes.
So onto the next part...
Let the horizontal and vertical accelerations of m in the ground frame be ax, ay.
Write out the ΣF=ma equations in those directions. These will involve N, T and mg.
Write the horizontal ΣF=ma equation for M.

We need two more equations. These express ax, ay in terms of a, amw.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #25
haruspex said:
Yes.
So onto the next part...
Let the horizontal and vertical accelerations of m in the ground frame be ax, ay.
Write out the ΣF=ma equations in those directions. These will involve N, T and mg.
Since ##a_m = a_{mw} + a## and for horizontal direction ##|a|> |a_{mw} \cos \alpha|##, I assume horizontally ##m## will move to the right with respect to the ground

∑F = m.ax
T cos α - N sin α = m.ax ...(1)

For vertical direction:
∑F = m.ay
mg - N cos α = m.ay ...(2)

Write the horizontal ΣF=ma equation for M.
∑F = M.a
N sin α = M.a ... (3)

We need two more equations. These express ax, ay in terms of a, amw.
ax = a - amw ... (4)

ay = amw sin α ... (5)

Is that correct?

Thanks
 
  • #26
songoku said:
Since ##a_m = a_{mw} + a## and for horizontal direction ##|a|> |a_{mw} \cos \alpha|##, I assume horizontally ##m## will move to the right with respect to the ground
I don't think that follows. Remember that amw is down and left.
songoku said:
For vertical direction:
∑F = m.ay
mg - N cos α = m.ay ...(2)
What about tension?
songoku said:
ax = a - amw ... (4)
amw has a vertical component.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #27
haruspex said:
What about tension?
For vertical direction:
ΣF = m.ay
mg - N cos α - T sin α = m.ay ... (2)

amw has a vertical component.
ax = a - amw cos α ... (4)

After a lot of algebra, I find the acceleration of M:

$$a=\frac{mg \cos⁡ \alpha}{M(\cos \alpha \cot \alpha+ \sin⁡ \alpha)+m \sin \alpha}$$

For question (b), I just need to substitute a to previous equations

For question (c), the answer is yes because total energy is always conservedFor question (d), would it be like, for M:
$$\Sigma F=M.a$$
$$N \sin \alpha - k.x = M.\frac{v.dv}{dx}$$
$$\int_0^{x_0} (N \sin \alpha - k.x)dx = M \int_p^{q} v~dv$$

Is this correct? And I suppose the value of ##q## = 0 but what will be the value for ##p##?

Thanks
 
  • #28
I agree with your answer for a, but it can be simplified. Multiply top and bottom as necessary to get rid of the cot.
d is quite easy if you just consider energy.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku
  • #29
haruspex said:
I agree with your answer for a, but it can be simplified. Multiply top and bottom as necessary to get rid of the cot.
I got:
$$a=\frac{\frac{1}{2}mg \sin 2 \alpha}{M+m (\sin \alpha)^2}$$

d is quite easy if you just consider energy.
The equation will be: loss in GPE of m + gain in KE of m = strain energy ?

Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #30
songoku said:
∑F = M.a
N sin α = M.a ... (3)
Be sure to take into account all of the forces acting on M. Anything in contact with M can exert a force on M. If you consider the pulley as part of M, then note that the string is in contact with M. (I think @Lnewqban hinted at this in post #16.)
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and Lnewqban
  • #31
@TSny pointed out your error, but I'd like to provide a little more context just because in my experience pulleys are notoriously poorly explained in school.

Although this problem tells us to neglect friction between the string and the pulley, it's more instructive to consider the general case where there is friction (which we will assume to be limiting), and then - if you want - to set ##\mu = 0## afterwards.

Suppose that the section of string in contact with the pulley subtends an angle ##(\pi - 2\alpha) / 2##, and superimpose a co-ordinate system whose ##y##-axis coincides with the axis of symmetry.

1617126695671.png


Now consider a small element at an angle ##\theta## to the ##x##-axis.

1617119110628.png


Balance the forces acting on the element tangential to the surface:$$T \left(\theta + \frac{d\theta}{2} \right) \cos{ \frac{d\theta}{2}} - T \left(\theta - \frac{d\theta}{2} \right) \cos{\frac{d\theta}{2}} - \mu N(\theta) = 0$$Balance the forces on the element normal to the surface:$$N(\theta) - T \left(\theta + \frac{d\theta}{2} \right) \sin{\frac{d\theta}{2}} - T \left(\theta - \frac{d\theta}{2} \right) \sin{\frac{d\theta}{2}} = 0$$You can simplify this by writing ##\cos{\frac{d\theta}{2}} \sim 1 - \frac{d\theta^2}{2}## and ##\sin{\frac{d\theta}{2}} \sim \frac{d\theta}{2}##, and further by noticing that

$$T \left(\theta + \epsilon \right) = T(\theta) + T'(\theta) \epsilon + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)$$If you write out those expansions then you'll obtain that, to first order in ##d\theta##,$$T'(\theta) d\theta = \mu N(\theta) \ \ \ (1)$$and$$N(\theta) = T(\theta) d\theta \ \ \ (2)$$don't be put off by the fact that what I called ##N(\theta)## is actually differential form! You can just combine to get the differential equation$$T'(\theta) = \mu T(\theta)$$and you may be aware that this has a solution ##T(\theta) = T(0)e^{\mu \theta}##; i.e. in the limiting case, the tension increases exponentially around the pulley. [Although the string is not in contact with the pulley at ##\theta = 0##, you can just view ##T(0)## as some constant fixing the solution].

We're not there yet, though, because we want to ultimately work out the force that the pulley exerts on the string - and then by NIII, the force that the string exerts on the pulley. For example, the ##y##-component of the contact force the pulley exerts on the string may be computed via an integral$$
\begin{align*}

\int_{\alpha}^{\pi - \alpha} dF_y = \int_{\alpha}^{\pi - \alpha}\left[ N(\theta) \sin{\theta} - \mu N(\theta) \cos{\theta} \right] &= \int_{\alpha}^{\pi - \alpha} (\sin{\theta} - \mu \cos{\theta}) T(\theta) d\theta \\ \\

&= T(0) \cos{\alpha} \left[ e^{\mu(\pi - \alpha)} + e^{\mu \alpha} \right]

\end{align*}$$But ##T(0)e^{\mu(\pi - \alpha)} = T(\pi - \alpha)## and ##T(0)e^{\mu \alpha} = T(\alpha)##, so you can see the y-component of force that the pulley exerts on the string is$$F_y = T(\alpha) \cos{\alpha} + T(\pi - \alpha) \cos{\alpha}$$and thus by NIII, the string exerts $$\tilde{F}_y = -T(\alpha) \cos{\alpha} - T(\pi - \alpha) \cos{\alpha}$$on the pulley, or in other words, exactly equivalent to if the pulley were acted upon by two forces ##T(\alpha)## and ##T(\pi - \alpha)## in the direction of the string, even though the tension forces don't actually act on the pulley (they only act on neighbouring bits of string!). You can [and should!] do a similar calculation for the ##x##-direction.

Another, perhaps more intuitive, way to think about it is to consider the string in contact with the pulley as part of the "pulley+string-in-contact-with-pulley system". Then, the force this system due to the string is just that exerted by the external axial tension on the bit of the string in contact with the pulley.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes songoku, TSny and Lnewqban
  • #32
TSny said:
Be sure to take into account all of the forces acting on M. Anything in contact with M can exert a force on M. If you consider the pulley as part of M, then note that the string is in contact with M. (I think @Lnewqban hinted at this in post #16.)
Damn! I had that originally then mislaid the scrap of paper. Thanks for picking it up.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and etotheipi
  • #33
haruspex said:
Damn! I had that originally then mislaid the scrap of paper.
I knew you were aware of the string's force on M as evidenced by your replies in similar threads.:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
  • #34
Well, it's a well known fact that @haruspex never makes mistakes... :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and TSny
  • #35
etotheipi said:
Well, it's a well known fact that @haruspex never makes mistakes... :wink:
"What never?"
"No never!"
"What never??"
"Well, hardly ever!"
(HMS Pinafore)
I know what happened... I had meantime been on another thread with a block and a pulley on a moving wedge, but in that case the string was tied to the wall.
 
  • Haha
Likes etotheipi
Back
Top