- #106
Proton Soup
- 223
- 1
Borek said:The fifth element.
that is worth seeing just for Leeloo Dallas, but more into the Sci Fantasy category i think, like Dune.
Borek said:The fifth element.
Borek said:To post something on the subject - if you will ever have a chance please watch Seksmisja (Sexmission) - Polish SF comedy shot in 1984. Cult movie here, will probably lost part of its charm outside of Poland, but should be still worth seeing.
Don't leave us hanging! Did they complete the augmentation before she got frozen??Huckleberry said:Some bubblegum chewing ditzy girl has complications during a breast augmentation surgery and is frozen.
Huckleberry said:I watched Seksmisja tonight and enjoyed it. It doesn't lose any of its charm crossing cultures. Thanks for the reference. I don't think I ever would have found it if you hadn't mentioned it. I'll be sure to recommend it to other SF fans I meet who love foreign cult classics.
DaveC426913 said:Oh, and of course Spirited Away, though that isn't really Anime.
Integral said:Anybody else watch, Torchwood: Childern of Earth ?
DaveC426913 said:Don't leave us hanging! Did they complete the augmentation before she got frozen??
Ivan Seeking said:Aha! "Seksmisja" translates as "Sexmission". Now I know why Huck watched. Maybe I will take a look [I see Netflix does have it].
Leave it to Borek to recommend a dirty movie.
Not yet. Netflix releases the series on the 28th of this month. It's already in my queue. You are talking about the series, right?Integral said:Anybody else watch, Torchwood: Childern of Earth ?
Integral said:Anybody else watch, Torchwood: Childern of Earth ?
Ivan Seeking said:I keep missing the beginning of it and don't want to start midstory. Is it good?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AelitaAelita (Russian: Аэлита), also known as Aelita: Queen of Mars, is a silent film directed by Soviet filmmaker Yakov Protazanov made on Mezhrabpom-Rus film studio and released in 1924. It was based on Alexei Tolstoy's novel of the same name. Mikhail Zharov and Igor Ilyinsky were cast in leading roles.
Though the main focus of the story is the daily lives of a small group of people during the post-war Soviet Union, the enduring importance of the film comes from its early science fiction elements. It primarily tells of a young man, Los' (Russian: Лось, literary Elk), traveling to Mars in a rocket ship, where he leads a popular uprising against the king, with the support of Queen Aelita who has fallen in love with him after watching him through a telescope.
Probably the first full-length movie about space travel, the most notable part of the film remains its remarkable constructivist Martian sets and costumes designed by Aleksandra Ekster. Their influence can be seen in a number of later films, including the Flash Gordon serials and probably Fritz Lang's Metropolis. While very popular at first, the film later fell out of favor with the Soviet government and was thus very difficult to see until after the Cold War.
Ideological significance...
octelcogopod said:A strange movie which is kind of cool is called "The Nines"
It's a purely story driven tale so not many special effects (but beautiful shots though etc)
I can't really reveal much about the story, but it's one of those mindbend type movies like in the mouth of madness etc.
git67 said:Firefly was a masterpiece
AI was OK - if it had ended where Kubrick intended it to, instead of where Speilberg did end it.EnumaElish said:A.I.
DaveC426913 said:AI was OK - if it had ended where Kubrick intended it to, instead of where Speilberg did end it.
The last 15 minutes. It should have ended with him on the bottom of the ocean.Ivan Seeking said:I liked AI. It was as much fairlytale as it was sci-fi, but enjoyable nonetheless.
What was different between the movie and what Kubrick wanted?
Huckleberry said:I just finished watching the 'Battlestar Galactica' reimagined series by Ron Moore.
DaveC426913 said:The last 15 minutes. It should have ended with him on the bottom of the ocean.
Yes but the extra ending for CE3K was the logical next step. It completed the story.Ivan Seeking said:Heh, I like it when they go beyond the horizon. Same was true with the Special Edition [or whatever they called it] of Close Encounters of the Third Kind: Be bold and take us inside of that mother ship!
DaveC426913 said:The last 15 minutes. It should have ended with him on the bottom of the ocean.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.I._Artificial_IntelligencePeople pretend to think they know Stanley Kubrick, and think they know me, when most of them don't know either of us," Spielberg told film critic Joe Leydon in 2002. "And what's really funny about that is, all the parts of A.I. that people assume were Stanley's were mine. And all the parts of A.I. that people accuse me of sweetening and softening and sentimentalizing were all Stanley's. The teddy bear was Stanley's. The whole last 20 minutes of the movie was completely Stanley's. The whole first 35, 40 minutes of the film – all the stuff in the house – was word for word, from Stanley's screenplay. This was Stanley's vision.
"Eighty percent of the critics got it all mixed up. But I could see why. Because, obviously, I've done a lot of movies where people have cried and have been sentimental. And I've been accused of sentimentalizing hard-core material. But in fact it was Stanley who did the sweetest parts of A.I., not me. I'm the guy who did the dark center of the movie, with the Flesh Fair and everything else. That's why he wanted me to make the movie in the first place. He said, 'This is much closer to your sensibilities than my own.'"[39]
siddharth said:I thought I had posted before, but I can't find it, so I'll mention Firefly again. Firefly was really special, and possibly the best TV show I've ever seen. There's also a movie based on the show called Serenity, which is pretty good.
You'll fit right in with the browncoats, Ivan.Ivan Seeking said:I watched the first episode tonight. I thought was okay but not great, however I can see that it has potential, so maybe it will just take a few episodes to get me hooked.
Ivan Seeking said:I was reading up on this and found that point is contested.
People pretend to think they know Stanley Kubrick, and think they know me, when most of them don't know either of us," Spielberg told film critic Joe Leydon in 2002. "And what's really funny about that is, all the parts of A.I. that people assume were Stanley's were mine. And all the parts of A.I. that people accuse me of sweetening and softening and sentimentalizing were all Stanley's. The teddy bear was Stanley's. The whole last 20 minutes of the movie was completely Stanley's. The whole first 35, 40 minutes of the film – all the stuff in the house – was word for word, from Stanley's screenplay. This was Stanley's vision.
"Eighty percent of the critics got it all mixed up. But I could see why. Because, obviously, I've done a lot of movies where people have cried and have been sentimental. And I've been accused of sentimentalizing hard-core material. But in fact it was Stanley who did the sweetest parts of A.I., not me. I'm the guy who did the dark center of the movie, with the Flesh Fair and everything else. That's why he wanted me to make the movie in the first place. He said, 'This is much closer to your sensibilities than my own.'"[39]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A.I._Artificial_Intelligence