Multipole Expansion of a Thin Rod: How to Derive the Potential?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the potential of a thin rod with uniform charge density λ, positioned along the z-axis. The potential at a point far from the rod is expressed using Legendre polynomials, but the initial attempts to solve the problem using cylindrical coordinates were unsuccessful. The user then switched to Cartesian coordinates, treating θ as constant, which allowed for the integration but resulted in an incorrect factor outside the integral. A suggestion was made to check the algebra for any errors. Ultimately, the user noted that the original question contained a mistake.
sitkican
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a very thin rod lying on the z axis from z = −L/2 to z = L/2. It carries a uniform charge density λ. Show that away from the rod, at the point r (r >>L), the potential can be written as V (r, θ) = (2Lλ/4πε0)(1/L)[ 1 + 1/3(L/2r)2P2(cos θ) + 1/3(L/2r)4 P4(cos θ) + · · ·# (1)

Homework Equations


special-techniques-teknik-khusus-11-728.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution


At the beginning, I tried to solve this question using cylindrical coordinates as there is some theta dependence in Legendre polynomial but it did not work.Then,I took the volume integral using cartesian coordinates and treating theta as constant.By doing that I could just take the Legendre polynomials out of the integration and calculate the integral with respect to z. I calculated the integral and put values of n up to n=4 and get the exact result in the square brackets but I have λL/4πε0r outside while I have to have 2λL/4πε0L.

What should I do know? Is my assumption,the theta is constant, true?

Thanks for your help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your algebra.
 
vela said:
Check your algebra.
thank you for your comment. the question is wrong, I informed today.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top