Calculus Multivariable Calculus, Hubbard and Hubbard and Lang's

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the best approach to learning multivariable calculus after studying Apostol Vol. I. The individual seeks guidance on whether to pursue Hubbard and Hubbard's 'Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms' or Serge Lang's 'Calculus of Several Variables' before progressing to Baby Rudin and Spivak's 'Calculus on Manifolds.' It is noted that Hubbard and Hubbard is recommended as a companion to Spivak due to its practical applications and examples, which complement Spivak's theoretical focus. The combination of both texts is suggested for a well-rounded understanding that balances abstract theory with practical application, particularly for those interested in applying calculus concepts to physics while maintaining a strong mathematical foundation.
unintuit
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I do not know multivariable calculus. I have studied out of Apostol Vol.1.

I do not want to learn the material from Apostol Vol. II.

Therefore I want to know If it would be worthwhile to go through Hubbard and Hubbard's 'Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms' after going through Serge Lang's 'Linear Algebra' or would it be better to go through Serge Lang's 'Calculus of Several Variables' and then Baby Rudin followed by Spivak's 'Calculus on Manifolds'?

Regardless, I am going to go through Baby Rudin and Spivak's 'Calculus on Manifolds' book, I really just want to know if it is worth the time to go through Hubbard and Hubbard or Lang's 'Calculus of Several Variables' or can I skip these and do Rudin and Spivak's book?

Thank you for your helpful responses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I want to apply the knowledge of Spivak's 'Calculus on Manifolds' to physics. However, I am still a math major. Physics is just an interesting aside.
 
That depends on your emphasis. I always recommend Hubbard/Hubbard as a companion to Spivak's Calculus on Manifolds due to the latter's extreme emphasis on purely theoretical applications. Hubbard/Hubbard includes practical considerations, such as finite precision techniques for computers, and applied examples of the theory of calculus on manifolds to physical and mechanical scenarios. Spivak, on the other hand, presents calculus on manifolds in an extremely elegant and concise way, so that every part of the general theory is well motivated and internally connected using very simple notation and definitions. So exposure to both can keep your ability to work with the abstract machinery in both theoretical and practical situations well rounded.
 
This thread only works as a summary from the original source: List of STEM Masterworks in Physics, Mechanics, Electrodynamics... The original thread got very long and somewhat hard to read so I have compiled the recommendations from that thread in an online (Google Drive) spreadsheet. SUMMARY Permits are granted so you can make comments on the spreadsheet but I'll initially be the only one capable of edition. This is to avoid the possibility of someone deleting everything either by mistake...
By looking around, it seems like Dr. Hassani's books are great for studying "mathematical methods for the physicist/engineer." One is for the beginner physicist [Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields] and the other is [Mathematical Physics: A Modern Introduction to Its Foundations] for the advanced undergraduate / grad student. I'm a sophomore undergrad and I have taken up the standard calculus sequence (~3sems) and ODEs. I want to self study ahead in mathematics...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top