Nakahara Solution of problems in chapter 9.and 10.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leeway
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving problems from chapters 9 and 10 of "Geometry, Topology and Physics" by Nakahara. One key question involves understanding why the Whitney sum of two Möbius strips is considered a trivial bundle, with participants debating the implications of transition matrices. Another problem focuses on demonstrating that the pullback of a volume element is closed and independent of the choice of a specific form. Participants suggest starting with simpler cases to clarify concepts, but urgency for solutions is expressed. Overall, the thread highlights the complexity of the problems and the collaborative effort to find solutions.
Leeway
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all , I would need help about how to solve the problems in chapters 9 and 10 of Geometry Topology and Physics, Nakahara. 1. Why the Whitney sum of 2 Mobium Strips is a trivial bundle - I found the transition matrices to be the identity, -identity . SO not all of them are identity -> the bundle is not trivial as it has to be. 2. I have a volume element Omega_n of S^n normalized as integral(Omega_n) = 1. Let f be a smooth map : S^2n-1 to S^n and consider the pullback f^*Omega_n. Show that the pullback is closed and written as d(omega_n-1), where omega_n-1 is a n-1 form on S^2n-1. Then show that the Hopf invariant H(f)=Integral{(omega_n-1) /\ d(omega_n-1) } is independent of the choise of omega_n-1. Please help me I will appreciate it very much ! PS: If you knew the solution of the Berry`s phase in chapter 10 pls let me know also .. ;o) Have a nice day.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Leeway. Welcome.

You have availed yourself of a great online resource. There are a lot of smart people here. I'm not one of them though. 210 posts and all of them questions. So its about time for me take a turn at answering one.

For the mobius strip question, picture the whitney sum as like a 2-bladed propeller attached to the line segment (circle) at its hub, each blade of the propellor is one instance of L. For the cylinder it just slides around as is. For the mobius strip, it might rotate 180 degrees at some point as it slides around, but it still looks the same. Therefore, the two cases are identical.

For problem #2, I would recommend working through a simple case, n=2 or 3, in explicit coordinates. Then you will probably see the result clearly and can apply it to the general case.

If you visit us often, learn LaTex, so you can do things like \int_{S_n}\Omega=1
 
Thank you a lot for such a long reply, I appreciate it really , anyway I have to have the problems solved quite fast so no time for a cases like n=2,3 in explicit coordinates ;o/ and thank you for the whitney sum advice .. I see .. but the structure group (transition functions) by Mobius strip is G = {e,g}, where g maps the fiber t->-t how is it possible that all the transition functions of the whitney sum are identity maps ? .. and do not worry I know Latex but I did not know that it works here, thanks ;o) ;o)
 
I spent some more time thinking about the mobius strip/Whitney sum problem and I don't really understand it either. If you find out, please come back and share. - Todd
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
589
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K