Near Point Without Spectacles: 1m

  • Thread starter Thread starter SwaggerJohn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
AI Thread Summary
For a nearsighted person with a far point of 1m, their spectacles should have a power of -1 diopter to enable clear vision at infinity. When wearing these glasses, their near point is at 0.25m. Without the spectacles, using the same formula, the near point would be calculated to be at -0.05m. This indicates that without the glasses, the individual would be unable to see objects clearly at a typical near distance. The calculations demonstrate the relationship between spectacle power and the near point in nearsighted individuals.
SwaggerJohn
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If the far point of a nearsighted person is 1m in front of their eyes:

a) What power should their spectacles have, so that they may see distinctly as object at infinity.

b) If when wearing these glasses, their near point is at 0.25m, where would it be without them?

So for a)
------------
1/f= 1/s + 1/s'
1/f = 1/infinity + 1/(-1)
=> f = -1m

So dioptric power is D = 1/f = 1/(-1) = -1 diopter

for b)
--------
any clues?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Figured it out:

use the same formula with f=-100 as found in a) and s=0.25 and then solve for s' which yields a value of -0.05.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Back
Top