Need help understanding these true/false questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter IntegrateMe
  • Start date Start date
IntegrateMe
214
1
Two students recorded rain data during a storm using different meteorological instruments. F(t) describes the total rainfall, in inches, t hours after the start of the storm.


Student1: F(0) = 0; F(1) = 0.3; F(2) = 0.5
Student2: F'(0) = 0.6; F'(1) = 0.7; F'(2) = 0.3

1. Assuming all data is correct, during the second hour of the storm, it was raining at a rate of 0.7 inches per hour.

The answer is false, but why isn't it true? Looking at student2's data, we see that F'(1) = 0.7, which essentially means that after the first hour of the storm (which would be during the second hour), rain was falling at 0.7 inches/hour, right?

2. Assuming all data is correct, during the first hour of the storm rainfall slowed down and later sped up.

The answer is true, but I don't really understand why. It seems to me like the rate at which rain is falling actually stays constant or even decreases during the first hour. Any thoughts?

3. Either student1's instrument or student2's instrument must be incorrect, because they give different values for F'(0) and F'(1).

I would think the answer is true, because the rate at which the rain is falling shouldn't be different with different measurements, but the answer is false. Is it because rainfall isn't something that can be measured accurately, so there's bound to be some differentiation between the two?

Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll try #2:
IntegrateMe said:
2. Assuming all data is correct, during the first hour of the storm rainfall slowed down and later sped up.

The answer is true, but I don't really understand why. It seems to me like the rate at which rain is falling actually stays constant or even decreases during the first hour. Any thoughts?
During the first hour of the storm is between t = 0 and t = 1. Looking at the average rate of change between these times, we get
\frac{F(1) - F(0)}{1 - 0} = 0.3 \text{ in./hr.}
Since this is less than both F'(0) and F'(1), there must some values of t where F'(t) is less than 0.3 in./hr.; otherwise, the average rate of rainfall between t = 0 and t = 1 wouldn't be 0.3 in./hr.
 
Bump?
 
How can F'(2) be smaller than F'(1)?
 
If the function is increasing and concave down, I suppose.

Increasing at a decreasing rate...
 
IntegrateMe said:
Two students recorded rain data during a storm using different meteorological instruments. F(t) describes the total rainfall, in inches, t hours after the start of the storm.


Student1: F(0) = 0; F(1) = 0.3; F(2) = 0.5
Student2: F'(0) = 0.6; F'(1) = 0.7; F'(2) = 0.3

1. Assuming all data is correct, during the second hour of the storm, it was raining at a rate of 0.7 inches per hour.

The answer is false, but why isn't it true? Looking at student2's data, we see that F'(1) = 0.7, which essentially means that after the first hour of the storm (which would be during the second hour), rain was falling at 0.7 inches/hour, right?

BTW, ignore my previous post; I misread the OP, sorry.

Re #1: No, read carefully: F'(1) is the rate of change of the rain _at t=1_
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply . Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top