- #71
Hal King
- 32
- 0
Nearly all the "idea" of 'dark energy' is based on the apparent acceleration seen when comparing data and models to an 'empty model' -- the Milne model.
Problem is: What if this is simply due to a 'quirk' in the Milne model? It is known to be wrong so why is this 'acceleration hump' being used as a reason for 'dark energy'?
Seems far more likely that its simply a shortcoming of the Milne -- and likely Standard Model.