I Noether's theorem for point particles

AI Thread Summary
Many textbooks on analytical mechanics lack a thorough discussion of Noether's theorem in relation to point particle Lagrangian mechanics. Recommendations for resources include "Emily Noether's Wonderful Theorem" by Dwight Neuenschwander, though it has been criticized for errors and shaky mathematics. Arnold's classical mechanics book and Marsden's comprehensive text may also cover the theorem, but they are noted for their mathematical complexity. The discussion highlights a gap in accessible literature on this topic. Overall, finding detailed and clear resources on Noether's theorem for point particles remains a challenge.
William Crawford
Messages
41
Reaction score
36
TL;DR Summary
Literature recommendations for Noether's theorem for point particles.
Hi PF,

As I'm delving back into analytical mechanics, I've noticed that many textbooks don't provide an in-depth discussion of Noether's theorem in the context of point particle Lagrangian mechanics. Does anyone have recommendations for resources (books or otherwise) that cover this topic in detail?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the reason for this is that one can model point particles as Dirac delta-function distributions. Then the continuum results of Noether's theorem carry over directly.
 
William Crawford said:
TL;DR Summary: Literature recommendations for Noether's theorem for point particles.

Hi PF,

As I'm delving back into analytical mechanics, I've noticed that many textbooks don't provide an in-depth discussion of Noether's theorem in the context of point particle Lagrangian mechanics. Does anyone have recommendations for resources (books or otherwise) that cover this topic in detail?

Thanks!
"Emily Noether's Wonderful Theorem" by Dwight Neuenschwander is dedicated to Noether's theorem. I had mixed feelings about it. There were a number of gross errors and I thought the Rund-Trautmann approach was mathematically a bit shaky. That said, I'm not sure there's anything better. Most other textbooks skate through the theorem very quickly.
 
I'm almost certain it is treated in Arnold's classical mechanics book and Marsden's giant tome, but both of those references are very much on the mathematical side of things. I don't have either at hand to be able to verify.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top