Noether's theorem for point particles

In summary, Noether's theorem for point particles establishes a profound connection between symmetries and conservation laws in physics. It states that for every continuous symmetry of the action of a physical system, there exists a corresponding conserved quantity. For example, translational symmetry in time leads to the conservation of energy, while spatial translational symmetry results in conservation of momentum. This theorem not only provides a foundational framework for classical mechanics but also extends to quantum mechanics and field theories, highlighting the fundamental role of symmetry in understanding physical laws.
  • #1
William Crawford
41
36
TL;DR Summary
Literature recommendations for Noether's theorem for point particles.
Hi PF,

As I'm delving back into analytical mechanics, I've noticed that many textbooks don't provide an in-depth discussion of Noether's theorem in the context of point particle Lagrangian mechanics. Does anyone have recommendations for resources (books or otherwise) that cover this topic in detail?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I believe the reason for this is that one can model point particles as Dirac delta-function distributions. Then the continuum results of Noether's theorem carry over directly.
 
  • #3
William Crawford said:
TL;DR Summary: Literature recommendations for Noether's theorem for point particles.

Hi PF,

As I'm delving back into analytical mechanics, I've noticed that many textbooks don't provide an in-depth discussion of Noether's theorem in the context of point particle Lagrangian mechanics. Does anyone have recommendations for resources (books or otherwise) that cover this topic in detail?

Thanks!
"Emily Noether's Wonderful Theorem" by Dwight Neuenschwander is dedicated to Noether's theorem. I had mixed feelings about it. There were a number of gross errors and I thought the Rund-Trautmann approach was mathematically a bit shaky. That said, I'm not sure there's anything better. Most other textbooks skate through the theorem very quickly.
 
  • #4
I'm almost certain it is treated in Arnold's classical mechanics book and Marsden's giant tome, but both of those references are very much on the mathematical side of things. I don't have either at hand to be able to verify.
 
Back
Top