Normal mode of an infinite spring pendulum system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the dispersion relations for an infinite spring pendulum system. The initial equation of motion is established, leading to a simplified dispersion relation involving sinusoidal terms. The user then shifts to consider a normal mode with exponentially decaying amplitudes, reworking the dispersion relation accordingly. The new relation incorporates hyperbolic cosine functions and gravitational effects, suggesting a more complex behavior of the system. The conversation concludes with a recommendation to simplify expressions for clarity, indicating that the algebra may become intricate.
Miles123K
Messages
57
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
The problem description is as follows. I am expected to find the frequency of the standing wave apparently.
Relevant Equations
F = ma
242922

First I worked out the dispersion relations, which is pretty easy:
##M \ddot x_j = K x_{j-1} + K x_{j+1} - 2K x_j -mg \frac {x_j} {l} ## (All t-derivatives)
We know ##x_j## will be in the form ##Ae^{ijka}e^{-i\omega t}##
so the above becomes:
## -\omega^2M = K (e^{-ika}+e^{ika}-2)-\frac {g} {l}##
Use trig identities to simplify and we get:
## \omega^2 = \frac {4K} {M} sin^2(\frac {ka} {2}) + \frac {g} {l}##
Now I think I am supposed to consider the forces on Block 0, so:
##F_{left} + F_{right} = F_0 = M \ddot x_0##
## K x_{j-1} + K x_{j+1} - 2K x_j = M \ddot x_0 = -M \omega^2 x_0## I think this is the subsystem mentioned in the hint?
In the question, it mentioned considering a normal mode of the form:
##A(x) = A_0 e^{-k \left| x \right |}##
So, I just plugged that into the above equation and got something like:
##2Ke^{-ka} = 2K - m \omega^2##
##e^{-ka} = 1 - \frac {m \omega^2} {2K}##
Log the above:
##ka = - ln(1-\frac {m \omega^2} {2K})##
However, I am unsure whether this is the correct solution. Do I just plug this ##ka## into the dispersion relations we got earlier?
Could someone check my answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Miles123K said:
First I worked out the dispersion relations, which is pretty easy:
##M \ddot x_j = K x_{j-1} + K x_{j+1} - 2K x_j -mg \frac {x_j} {l} ## (All t-derivatives)
We know ##x_j## will be in the form ##Ae^{ijka}e^{-i\omega t}##


The factor ##e^{ijka}## implies that the amplitudes of the blocks vary sinusoidally in space. But in this problem, you are looking for a mode for which the amplitudes exponentially decay as you move away from the origin. Replace ##e^{ijka}## by an appropriate expression and rederive the dispersion relation. Use the dispersion relation in conjunction with the equation of motion of block 0.
 
  • Like
Likes Miles123K
TSny said:
The factor ##e^{ijka}## implies that the amplitudes of the blocks vary sinusoidally in space. But in this problem, you are looking for a mode for which the amplitudes exponentially decay as you move away from the origin. Replace ##e^{ijka}## by an appropriate expression and rederive the dispersion relation. Use the dispersion relation in conjunction with the equation of motion of block 0.
Oh okay, the new dispersion relations I obtained are as follows:
##\omega^2=\frac {K} {m} (2 - e^{ka} - e^{-ka}) + \frac {g} {l}##
which simplifies to:
##\omega^2=\frac {2K} {m} (1 - cosh(ka)) + \frac {g} {l}##
If I plug in the ##ka## I got above I get the answer?
 
Miles123K said:
Oh okay, the new dispersion relations I obtained are as follows:
##\omega^2=\frac {K} {m} (2 - e^{ka} - e^{-ka}) + \frac {g} {l}##
which simplifies to:
##\omega^2=\frac {2K} {m} (1 - cosh(ka)) + \frac {g} {l}##
That looks good.
If I plug in the ##ka## I got above I get the answer?
That should work. Off hand, I don't see a way to avoid some messy algebra. You could simplify the writing a bit by defining ##\omega_s = \sqrt{\frac{2K}{M}}## and ##\omega_p = \sqrt{\frac{g}{l}}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Miles123K
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top