Normalization of a wave function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around normalizing the wave function psi(x) = b(a^2 - x^2) for a particle confined within the interval -a to +a. The user successfully derived the normalization constant b as sqrt(15/16a^5) through integration, confirming the method is correct. For the probability of finding the particle at x = +a/2 within a small interval, the initial calculation yielded 0.7 percent, but an error was identified in squaring a term, revising the probability to 0.5 percent. The user has not yet attempted part C, which requires integration over a larger interval. Overall, the calculations for parts A and B are validated, with a minor correction needed for part B's final result.
leehufford
Messages
97
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A particle is described by the wave function psi(x) = b(a2-x2) for -a < x < +a and psi(x) = 0 for x < -a and x > +a, where a and b are positive real number constants.

a) Using the normalization condition, find b in terms of a.
b) What is the probability to find the particle at x = +a/2 in a small interval of width 0.010a?
c) What is the probability for the particle to be found between x = +a/2 and x = +a?

Homework Equations



Psi(x) = b(a2-x2)
The integral of Psi(x)2 from negative infinity to infinity must equal one, so that way it can exist.
P(x) dx = (Psi(x))2

The Attempt at a Solution



I have an answer, but I was hoping someone could confirm I did this right, this concept is brand new to me and my answer from A looks weird to me.

Part A:

b2* Integral of (a2-x2)(a2-x2) dx = 1 (From -a to a, since everywhere else Psi is zero).

b2[a4x - (2/3)a2x2 + (1/5)x5] dx = 1 evaluated from -a to a...

b2[(a5-(2/3)a5+(1/5)a5) - (-a5 + (2/3)a5-(1/3)a5) = 1

b2(16a5/15) = 1, so b = sqrt(15/16a5).

Part B:

P(x)dx = (Psi(x))2 dx

= (15/16a5)(a2-x2)2 dx
= (15/16a5)(a2 - (1/4)a2)2(0.010a)
= (15/16a5)(3/4)a4(0.010a)
=0.007, or 0.7 percent chance of finding the particle there.

Part C: I didn't attempt part C because I wanted to hopefully get some feedback that I was on the right track before I started part C. Looks like I will actually have to integrate for part C since the interval is bigger. Thanks for reading.

Lee
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I did not check your computations in detail, but your approach is correct and assuming you did the math correctly your results for (a) and (b) should therefore be correct as well. Just watch out for (what I assume is) the typo in aa in your problem formulation.
 
Thank you Orodruin for your reply and noticing the typo. It's been corrected. I'm pleased to know the approach is correct since I have already double checked the math.
 
There are indeed many typos, but there is also an error in part b.

leehufford said:
= (15/16a5)(3/4)a4(0.010a)
That equation (and the number you get from it) is incorrect.
 
DrClaude - thank you for the reply. I noticed i forgot to square the (3/4), so my final equation is now

(15/16a5)(9/16)a4(0.010a) = 0.005 = 0.5 percent chance.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top