Normalizing a wave function and calculating probability of position

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on normalizing a wave function for a particle in a one-dimensional infinite potential well and calculating the probability of finding the particle within a specific range. The wave function is expressed as a linear combination of stationary states, and the normalization process involves integrating the squared modulus of the wave function over the interval from 0 to L. The user attempts to derive the normalized wave function and finds that it simplifies to a specific form, leading to a probability calculation for the particle's position between L/4 and 3L/4. Clarifications are sought regarding the normalization steps and the interpretation of the wave function's components.
Emspak
Messages
240
Reaction score
1
Forgive me if this goes in elementary physics, but I think since it's an upper level undergrad class

Homework Statement



A state of a particle bounded by infinite potential walls at x=0 and x=L is described by a wave function \psi = 1\phi_1 + 2\phi_2 where \phi_i are the stationary states.
a) Normalize the wave function.
b) What is the probability to find the particle between x=L/4 and x=3L/4?

Homework Equations



OK so was looking at how to approach this. One thought was to start with Schrödinger's equation

i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2} + V(x)\psi(x,t)

The Attempt at a Solution



We have a situation where V(x) = 0 0 < x < L and V(x) = infinity outside of that. SO the V(x) term for inside the well disappears (it's zero).

And Energy, E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} where k is a constant, in this case 1.

That leaves us with a partial differential equation

i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2}

which, moving it around a little,

i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2} = 0

and that's a 2nd order differential equation. The solutions are

\psi(x,t) = [A \sin(kx) + B \cos(kx)] e^{-i\omega t}

k is a wavenumber and for this to work -- for it to be zero when x is greater than L or less than 0, and some value anywhere else, the cosine term has to go, and since the wavenumber is limited to nπ/L (that's the only way you get an integral number of waves) So I should end up with

\psi(x,t) = [A \sin(k_nx)] e^{-i\omega_n t}But I am not entirely sure why the cos term has to go; I feel like I am missing a step. Either way, the probability of the particle being at any point from 0 to L is 1. So I need to integrate the wave function squared over that interval:

\int^L_0 |[A \sin(k_nx)] e^{-i\omega_n t}|^2 dx

but that's the thing, I feel like I have lost the plot with this.

ANother way to approach it was to assume that the wave function given can be

\psi = 1\phi_1 + 2\phi_2
\psi = (1\phi_1 + 2\phi_2)(1\phi_1^* + 2\phi_2^*)

and then multiply this out
\psi = (1\phi_1^* \phi_1 + 2\phi_1 \phi_2^* + 2\phi_1^* \phi_2 + 4\phi_2^*\phi_2)

SInce the phi functions are eigenvalues, the ones on the diagonal of the matrix are the only ones not zero. So we get
\psi = (1\phi_1^* \phi_1 + 4\phi_2^*\phi_2) = (1 + 4)

because the complex conjugate of a function multiplied by a function is 1.

Tht makes the whole thing add up to five. and since the probability of finding the particle on the interval 0 to x is

\int^L_0 |\psi|^2 dx = 1 \rightarrow \int^L_0 |5|^2 dx = 1 \rightarrow 25x = 1

so x = 1/25 for the whole interval, so normalizing the wave function I should get

\psi = \frac{1}{25}\phi_1 + \frac{2}{25}\phi_2

and for the probability that the particle is at L/4 and 3/4 L

(25/4)^2 and (75/4)^2

Now, if someone could tell me where I am getting lot and doing this completely wrong :-)

thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the original question you state that the wave function is "=11+22, where are the stationary states" are those boxes a mistake?
 
try it now...
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top