Notation within homework question

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike_302
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the notation of potential energy U(x,y) given by U(x,y)=2x + x^3, where the participant questions the relevance of the y variable since the solution only involves x. The correct interpretation of change in potential energy is clarified as U(initial) - U(final), aligning with the principle that change equals initial minus final values. The notation is defended as appropriate for functions of multiple variables, despite the specific problem relying solely on x. Ultimately, the participant acknowledges understanding the work-energy relationship while still finding the notation confusing.
mike_302
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle moving along the x-axis is subject to a conservative force such that the potential energy of the particle is given by U(x,y)=2x + x^3 where x and y are in meters, U is in joules. When the particle moves from (2,0) to the origin, the work done by the conservatice force is:
A) b) c) d) (the choices don't matter... I have the right value, wrong sign)


Homework Equations



delta(U) = change in potential energy.

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, my real question here is: What does this notation U(x,y) really mean?

And I checked the solution for this problem, and it says U(initial) - U(final)... Why is this? Since when is the change in a value equal to initial - final ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The notation U(x, y) is used to indicate that U is a function of two variables, x and y. The formula you show, however, is a function of x alone.
mike_302 said:
the potential energy of the particle is given by U(x,y)=2x + x^3 where x and y are in meters
Is there a typo in this formula? Should it be U(x, y) = 2x + y^3?
 
mike_302 said:
… I checked the solution for this problem, and it says U(initial) - U(final)... Why is this? Since when is the change in a value equal to initial - final ?

Hi mike_302! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Change in potential energy = minus the work done

ie ∆PE = -W

so the work done will be -∆PE = Uinitial - Ufinal
 
Okay, I completely see why it's Ui-Uf now but that U(x,y) notation seems messed up because there's no typo :P That's how it is written, and I get the answer using JUST x, so I guess it should've said U(x)= ...

Oh well!
 
mike_302 said:
… that U(x,y) notation seems messed up because there's no typo :P That's how it is written, and I get the answer using JUST x, so I guess it should've said U(x)= ...

No, because potential is a function of position, and has to be defined at every position …

for example gravitational potential is U(x,y,z) = -gz. :wink:
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top