Nuclear Macroscopic cross-section

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the number density of constituents in a mixture and their normal densities, specifically in the context of calculating the macroscopic absorption cross-section. The user seeks clarification on how to express the macroscopic cross-section of a mixture, leading to the formulation of an equation that incorporates both the number of atoms and their respective microscopic cross-sections. The conversation highlights the importance of ensuring dimensional consistency in the equations presented. Ultimately, the user arrives at a satisfactory understanding of the relationship, confirming that the units check out correctly. The thread effectively addresses the complexities of nuclear engineering concepts related to cross-sections in mixtures.
badvot
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Calculate the macroscopic cross section using volume fractions
Relevant Equations
Macroscopic nuclear cross section
This question is in the book " Introduction to nuclear engineering by Lamarsh" Chapter3:
Screenshot 2024-05-03 210913.png

I think it's pretty basic but I couldn't find the proper way to prove it, and now I even suspect that it's not a correct question.
My attempt solution:


Screenshot 2024-05-03 211748.png


I would very much appreciate your help. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to distinguish between the number density ##N_i^{(mix)}## of constituent ##i## in the mixture and the number density ##N_i^{(norm)}## of constituent ##i## at its normal density.

How is ##N_i^{(mix)}## related to ##N_i^{(norm)}## and ##f_i##?

You are asked to show, $$\Sigma_a^{(mix)} = f_1 \Sigma_{a1}^{(norm)} + f_2 \Sigma_{a2}^{(norm)} + ...$$
 
Thank you so much. I think I get it now, and here is my understanding:
If we assume two species (x,y)
$$\Sigma_{mix}= \frac{No\ of\ X\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ X} \times \frac{Volume\ of\ X}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} + \frac{No\ of\ Y\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ Y} \times \frac{Volume\ of\ Y}{Volume\ of\ X+Y}$$
 
badvot said:
Thank you so much. I think I get it now, and here is my understanding:
If we assume two species (x,y)
$$\Sigma_{mix}= \frac{No\ of\ X\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ X} \times \frac{Volume\ of\ X}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} + \frac{No\ of\ Y\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ Y} \times \frac{Volume\ of\ Y}{Volume\ of\ X+Y}$$
The left side of your equation, ##\Sigma_{mix}##, is the macroscopic absorption cross-section of the mixture. This has the dimension of inverse length. However, the right side of your equation has the dimension of inverse volume.

Also, you would expect ##\Sigma_{mix}## to depend on the microscopic absorption cross-sections ##\sigma_{a1}## and ##\sigma_{a2}## of the two species. However, these do not appear on the right side.
 
Oh, I guess I was so enthusiastic to write the answer that I forgot to include the microscopic cross-section for each species :oldbiggrin:
$$\Sigma_{mix}= \frac{No\ of\ X\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ X} \times
\frac{Volume\ of\ X}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} \times \sigma_{X} + \frac{No\ of\ Y\ atoms}{Volume\ of\ Y} \times \frac{Volume\ of\ Y}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} \times \sigma_{Y}$$
The volume fractions are those below, while the rest of the terms ##\sigma \times \frac{No\ of\ atoms}{Volume}## equal the ##\Sigma_{a}^{(norm)}## for each species
$$\frac{Volume\ of\ X}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} =F_{X}$$
$$\frac{Volume\ of\ Y}{Volume\ of\ X+Y} =F_{Y}$$
The units check out
$$cm^{-1}= \frac{\#}{cm^{3}} \times \frac{cm^{3}}{cm^{3}} \times cm^{2} + \frac{\#}{cm^{3}} \times \frac{cm^{3}}{cm^{3}} \times cm^{2} $$
 
OK. That looks good.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top