MHB Number Line & Intervals (Part 2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    intervals Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving inequalities involving absolute values and representing the solutions on a number line. For the inequality |x - 4| < 4, the solution is the interval (0, 8), indicating all real numbers between 0 and 8. For the inequality |x + 5| >= 2, the solution consists of two intervals: (-∞, -7] and [-3, ∞), representing all numbers whose distance from -5 is greater than or equal to 2. Participants confirm the accuracy of these intervals and provide visual representations on a number line. The conversation emphasizes understanding absolute value inequalities and their graphical interpretations.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
The set of real numbers satisfying the given inequality is one or more intervals on the number line. Show the intervals on a number line.

(A) |x - 4| < 4

(B) |x + 5| >= 2

For (A), I did the following:

-4 < x - 4 < 4

I now add 4 to each term.

0 < x < 8

On the number line, I would need to plot (0, 8). Is this correct?

For (B), we have the following:

|x + 5| >= 2

x + 5 < -2 or x + 5 >= 2

x =< -2 - 5 or x >= 2 - 5

x =< - 7 or x >= -3

I must plot [-infinity, -7] and [-3, infinity] on the number line. Is this right?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
a) $$|x-4|<4$$

I would read this as a distance formula, that is, all real numbers $x$ that are less than 4 units from 4, which as you stated is the interval $(0,8)$.

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2.5]
\draw[very thick] (0,0) -- (8,0);
\path [draw=black, fill=white, thick] (0,0) circle (2pt);
\path [draw=black, fill=white, thick] (8,0) circle (2pt);
\draw[latex-latex] (-0.5,0) -- (8.5,0) ;
\foreach \x in {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}
\draw[shift={(\x,0)},color=black] (0pt,3pt) -- (0pt,-3pt);
\foreach \x in {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}
\draw[shift={(\x,0)},color=black] (0pt,0pt) -- (0pt,-3pt) node[below]
{$\x$};
\end{tikzpicture}

b) $$|x+5|\ge2$$

I would read this as all real numbers $x$ whose distance from $-5$ is greater than or equal to 2, which as you stated is the interval $(-\infty,-7]\,\cup\,[-3,\infty)$.

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2.5]
\path [draw=black, fill=black, thick] (-7,0) circle (2pt);
\path [draw=black, fill=black, thick] (-3,0) circle (2pt);
\draw[latex-latex] (-9.5,0) -- (-0.5,0) ;
\draw[->,thick] (-7,0) -- (-9.25,0);
\draw[->,thick] (-3,0) -- (-0.75,0);
\foreach \x in {-9,-8,-7,-6,-5,-4,-3,-2,-1}
\draw[shift={(\x,0)},color=black] (0pt,3pt) -- (0pt,-3pt);
\foreach \x in {-9,-8,-7,-6,-5,-4,-3,-2,-1}
\draw[shift={(\x,0)},color=black] (0pt,0pt) -- (0pt,-3pt) node[below]
{$\x$};
\end{tikzpicture}
 
MarkFL said:
a) $$|x-4|<4$$

I would read this as a distance formula, that is, all real numbers $x$ that are less than 4 units from 4, which as you stated is the interval $(0,8)$.

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2.5]
\draw[very thick] (0,0) -- (8,0);
\path [draw=black, fill=white, thick] (0,0) circle (2pt);
\path [draw=black, fill=white, thick] (8,0) circle (2pt);
\draw[latex-latex] (-0.5,0) -- (8.5,0) ;
\foreach \x in {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}
\draw[shift={(\x,0)},color=black] (0pt,3pt) -- (0pt,-3pt);
\foreach \x in {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}
\draw[shift={(\x,0)},color=black] (0pt,0pt) -- (0pt,-3pt) node[below]
{$\x$};
\end{tikzpicture}

b) $$|x+5|\ge2$$

I would read this as all real numbers $x$ whose distance from $-5$ is greater than or equal to 2, which as you stated is the interval $(-\infty,-7]\,\cup\,[-3,\infty)$.

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2.5]
\path [draw=black, fill=black, thick] (-7,0) circle (2pt);
\path [draw=black, fill=black, thick] (-3,0) circle (2pt);
\draw[latex-latex] (-9.5,0) -- (-0.5,0) ;
\draw[->,thick] (-7,0) -- (-9.25,0);
\draw[->,thick] (-3,0) -- (-0.75,0);
\foreach \x in {-9,-8,-7,-6,-5,-4,-3,-2,-1}
\draw[shift={(\x,0)},color=black] (0pt,3pt) -- (0pt,-3pt);
\foreach \x in {-9,-8,-7,-6,-5,-4,-3,-2,-1}
\draw[shift={(\x,0)},color=black] (0pt,0pt) -- (0pt,-3pt) node[below]
{$\x$};
\end{tikzpicture}

Cool. Thanks.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top