Number of quantum accessible states of a particle given T, N?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of quantum accessible states for a gas of identical particles at a fixed temperature T and spin S. The density of orbital states is defined as g(ε) = g0 for ε in the range [ε0, ε1], leading to the integration of g(ε) to find the total number of states. The result indicates that with N particles and spin S, the number of accessible states is (2S + 1), with the spin set to zero yielding only one state. The states remain degenerate and equally accessible at any temperature in the absence of external perturbations. Clarification is sought regarding the concept of orbital states in this context.
damarkk
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
How to find a number of accessible quantum states of a gas particle with spin S and given T, N (number of particles of the system)?
Relevant Equations
Boson gas, Fermion gas
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and

##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise.

How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle?


This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system.

Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have ##\int_{\epsilon_0}^{\epsilon_1} g(\epsilon) d\epsilon## and we get that is ##g_0(\epsilon_1-\epsilon_0)##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems that we have N particles with spin S in contact with a heat bath at temperature T. OK.
That is enough to specify the number of accessible states as (2S+1). Setting the spin equal to zero would result in one state only.
In the absence of a perturbation, e.g. an external magnetic field, the (2S+1) states are degenerate which makes them equally accessible at any temperature.
Also, I do not understand the bit about orbital states. Whence orbital states? Presumably the particles are free.

Can you give us the original statement /question as you were given, damarkk?

Attn @kuruman
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top