A Numerical implementation of creation and annhilation operators in the SSH model

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter JangMilad
  • Start date Start date
JangMilad
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm working on a numerical simulation involving the SSH model and the density matrix formalism. I'm using annihilation and creation operators at the first site, denoted by a_1 and a_1^\dagger, and I'm trying to understand how to construct and compute expressions like:

a_1 \rho a_1^\dagger
a_1^\dagger \rho a_1

where \rho is the density matrix of the system.

My goal is to implement this numerically. I would appreciate any insights on:

How to define the annihilation/creation operators for a lattice model like SSH.

The physical meaning of the above expressions (e.g., in the context of Lindblad dissipators).

Any tips or references for constructing these operators explicitly in matrix form.

Thanks in advance for your help!
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top