- #666
ParticleGrl
- 335
- 23
mheslep said:At the moment I'm not really interested in the model. Empirically we know that long term tax rates impact output significantly, and thus sooner or later employment.
The evidence isn't as clear cut as you suggest. The Romer paper comes in with significantly higher estimates than lots of other papers that attempted similar work. This isn't surprising- estimating the effect of tax cuts is a nightmare, there are simply way to many confounding variables (I assume we both agree that marginal brackets of 90% should be high enough to hurt growth, but US history wouldn't play that out). The Romer paper also notes that more recent cuts have had smaller impacts.
And most of the empirical literature will support my broader point- spending is far more relevant to jobs than marginal rates. In the long term, of course, spending and tax rates have to converge, but in the short term, there is no reason this has to be true, especially with the market offering free money.
Last edited: