I Odds of getting pairs -- QM version

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter anuttarasammyak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
anuttarasammyak
Gold Member
Messages
2,950
Reaction score
1,521
As a spin out of How to calculate these odds?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-to-calculate-these-odds.1012014/
I have a question for quantum objects.
Question : An atom system has 16 different energy levels filled with 16 electron pairs of opposite spin direction. We pick up or measuring energy of 4 of them. Calculate odds for numbers of pairs of same energy we get in the observation results.

I assume:
If we observe spin z component of electrons together, the result is same as the thread.
If we do not observe it the number of cases are
2 pairs : ##\ _{16}C_2 = 120##
1 pair : ##\ _{16}C_1 \ _{15}C_2 = 1680 ##
0 pair : ##\ _{16}C_4 = 1820##
Total case number is ##120+1680+1820=3620##
So the probabilities are
P(2)=0.033 > 0.003 which is the result in the thread
P(1)=0.464 > 0.187
P(0)=0.503 < 0.810

I would like to know whether such a difference between classical and quantum cases takes place or not and if yes also this calculation is reasonable or not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ha, I like it. subbed.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Back
Top