On GR and Interstellar exploration

owenhbrown
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello folks,

I was wondering about a possible probe sent to alpha centauri which would be able to do a deep scan of the system, maybe for a month, and then send back results.

I then wondered, that if the probe was exposed to different gravitational conditions, let's say favourbly, would information come back sooner than we expected because of a difference in time perception?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alpha centauri is 4.3 light years away. A signal sent back to Earth from a probe near that star would take 4.3 years to get here.
 
My question is regarding time spent scanning the system, not time traveling there or back.

I am asking that if the probe is given a month to scan the system, is it possible that, because of relative time, it may require less or more than an Earth month to complete the scan, because the same length of time time near Alpha Centauri moves faster or slower relative to us.

So you see, the issues of interstellar travel were not brought up.
 
Time runs slower for clocks deeper in a gravity well, so the only situation in which an observer measures a distant clock to run faster due to gravitational time dilation is if the observer is closer to a source of gravity than the clock. I'm pretty sure the gravitational time dilation from the Earth and Sun is too small to make any significant difference in the rate of local clocks vs. distant clocks, but if you imagine an observer on a ship very close to a black hole who is receiving signals from a probe far from the black hole, she could see the signals appreciably sped up.
 
To give an idea of how small the effect would be, if the probe were to land on the surface of a very small and dense neutron star we might find that it takes 2 months to complete its scan.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top