On the definition of Von Neumann entropy

univector
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I am confused by the definition of the Von Neumann entropy. In Nielson and Chung's book page 510, the Von Neumann entropy is defined as
S (\rho) = - tr(\rho \log \rho)
where \rho is the density matrix. What is the definition of the logrithm of a matrix? Is it some series expansion of a matrix, or an element-by-element logrithm?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that

\frac{d}{dx}\log(1+x)=\frac{1}{1+x}=1-x+x^2-x^3+\cdots

Integrate.

\log(1+x)=x-\frac{x^2}{2}+\frac{x^3}{3}-\frac{x^4}{4}+\cdots

Now set y=1+x.

\log y=(y-1)-\frac{(y-1)^2}{2}+\cdots=\sum_{k=1}^\infty(-1)^{k+1}\frac{(y-1)^k}{k}

This suggests that if A is a matrix, we can define log A by

\log A=\sum_{k=1}^\infty(-1)^{k+1}\frac{(A-I)^k}{k}

for all matrices A such that the series converges. More information here.
 
Last edited:
Hi Fredrik,

Thanks for the explanation. If the matrix \rho is not diagonal, it is not trivial to calculate the matrix polynomial series. Instead, if we do a similary transform to diagonize \rho first, things may become easier. Let the diagonal matrix be D. Then by using the series expansion forward (for a matrix) and backward (for a number), we can come up with
S(\rho) = tr (D M),
where
M = \left( \begin{array}{cccc} \log \lambda_1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; ... \\<br /> 0 &amp; \log \lambda_2 &amp; 0 &amp; ... \\<br /> ... &amp; ... &amp; ... &amp; ... \\<br /> 0 &amp; ... &amp; 0 &amp; \log \lambda_n<br /> \end{array} \right)
where \lambda_i is the ith engenvalue of matrix \rho (or D), and n is the number of rows (also columns) of \rho .

Is this the way people calculate S(\rho)?
 
Yes.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...

Similar threads

Back
Top