One Dimensional QM particle Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanical particle described by a specific Hamiltonian, prompting questions about dimensional analysis and the application of the uncertainty principle. Participants seek to express the dimensions of mass, hbar, and the constant K in terms of energy, time, and length. There is a focus on deriving the energy and spatial extent of the wavefunction for the ground state, emphasizing the relationship between kinetic and potential energy. Clarifications are made regarding the variable "u," which is identified as mass, and the importance of basic principles in solving these technical problems. The conversation highlights the need for foundational understanding in tackling complex quantum mechanics issues.
demanjo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear All, This is my first post. I appreciate your help. I have the following question which i am struggling to understand, let alone solve.

Consider a quantum mechanical particle with the mass m moving in one-dimensional described by the following Hamiltonian;

(1)\hat{H} = \frac{\hat{p}^2}{2m} + \frac{K}{2}\hat{x}^6
Here, p and x are the operators for the momentum and position, respectively, which satisfy the commutation equation [\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i\hbar. K is a constant.

1) Express the dimensions of m, hbar, and K in terms of the energy (Joules), the time (seconds) and the length (meter).

2) Express the Energy E0 and the spatial extent S of the wavefunction for the ground state of the Hamiltonian eq. (1) using u, hbar, and K in terms of the dimensional analysis. Numerical co-efficients are not necessary to be determined.

3) Derive the results of 2) based on the uncertainty principle.
If someone can aid me I would greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
part 1: This is technical.

In part 2, what is u?

In part 3, think about how to use the uncertainty principle. In the ground state, the kinetic energy and the potential energy can be assumed to be approximately equal. You can also assume that the uncertainty relation holds and that you have (approximately) an equality.

To make use of the uncertainty principle, consider the relation between the kinetic energy and uncertainty in the momentum.
 
Thank you for the reply.
u is m (mass), sorry, this was a typo.

If i could get through part one, maybe i could have a stab at 2 and 3, considering i am vaguely aware how to use the uncertainty principle, but as you states, 1 is technical, and i cannot even get past that...
 
No help possible?
 
Hi,

sorry for the delay.

In q.1 - to get the units, go back to the basics. For example, energy is force times distance, and force is acceleration times mass. From that you can get to the mass. hbar is energy times time, or distance times momentum - you can use those. To get the units of K, note that Kx^6 has the same units has the Hamiltonian. What are the Hamiltonian's units?
 
Thanks a lot for your reply. I was thinking far too deeply, and didnt think about basics.


My guess would be the Hamiltonian has the units as governed by its components, namely m, and p, where p corresponds to ihbar
So would the units be m/h, which means m/(m^2kg.s) = s/m.kg?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top