Optimize Filter Thickness with MCNP5 for Phosphorus 32 Bremsstrahlung

  • Thread starter Addali sabah
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Mcnp5
In summary: MCNP to simulate.In summary, the conversation discusses the optimization of thickness of filters to reduce the continuous Bremsstrahlung spectrum emitted by phosphorus 32 using MCNP5 code. The main question is about the correct form of declaration of Bremsstrahlung in the input file and which cards to use for it. The experts suggest using a source of electrons and photons with mode pe and defining a detector region made of Ge with an F8:p,e tally to get the probability of each energy. The input file provided by the person asking the question is also reviewed and some suggestions for corrections are given.
  • #1
Addali sabah
8
0
TL;DR Summary
bremsstrahlung simulated by MCNP5
I am working on optimizing the thickness of the filters in order to reduce the continuous Bremsstrahlung spectrum emitted by phosphorus 32 with a maximum energy of 1.8 MeV measured by the Ge(HP) detector using MCNP5 code but unfortunately I don't haven't found the exact form of declaration of bremsstrahlung in the MCNP5 input file, how can I find the correct form of declaration of bremsstrahlung in the MCNP5, and what cards are used for it?. what is the tally to use to get the probability of each energy?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi,
I'm not sure to understand your problem.
Just transport electrons and photons (mode e p). Your source must be electrons (sdef par=e) and Bremsstrahlung photons will be produced (Bremsstrahlung photons spectrum) and transported.
 
  • Like
Likes Alex A
  • #3
PSRB191921 said:
Hi,
I'm not sure to understand your problem.
Just transport electrons and photons (mode e p). Your source must be electrons (sdef par=e) and Bremsstrahlung photons will be produced (Bremsstrahlung photons spectrum) and transported.
thank you but
how can i declare this " Bremsstrahlung photons will be produced (Bremsstrahlung photons spectrum) and transported" in the mcnp5 input file? .is it in phys cards ?
 
  • #4
I believe @PSRB191921 's point is that if you put a source of beta rays in a source region made of the same elements your real source is made of, they will interact and produce Bremsstrahlung in same way it happens in the real world. So long as your mode is pe this should happen automatically. If the spectrum is wrong you will need to change the elements in the source to alter it.

If you define a detector region made of Ge, and do an F8:p,e tally, you can set an E8 card with a large number of energy bins around the regions of interest.
 
  • Like
Likes PSRB191921
  • #5
can you help me to find the mistake in the input file ? Is it this declaration correct for the bremsstrahlung?
this is my input file ( The modeled geometry is composed of the detector( Ge HP) and a parallelepiped source P32 )
1 1 -5.323 (2 :3 )1 -4 -5
2 2 -1.82 -6
3 0 -7 #1 #2
4 0 7

1 pz 0
2 pz 5.1
3 cz 0.6
4 pz 6.1
5 cz 3.025
6 rpp -0.5 0.5 -0.5 0.5 11 11.1
7 so 15

mode p e
m1 32000. 1 $Ge
m2 15032. 1 $P
imp:p 1 2r 0 $ 1, 4
imp:e 1 3r $ 1, 4
sdef PAR=3 ERG=1.7 x=d1 y=d2 z=d3 vec= 0 0 -1 dir=1
si1 -0.5 0.5
sp1 0 1
si2 -0.5 0.5
sp2 0 1
si3 11 11.1
sp3 0 1
nps 1000000
cut:p,e j 0.001
f8:p 1
e8 0 1e-03 120i 1.8
ft8 geb 0.707E-03 0.946E-03
phys:e 2 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
phys:p 2 0 1 0 1
I want to find the spectrum of phosphorus 32 (bremsstrahlung) and the X-rays from germanium.
 
  • #6
Your first line isn't supposed to be a cell line (It might not be, maybe you just didn't copy your title). imp:e is weird you seem to be setting importance to 1 for the void. The source xyz needs setting. You have filled the source with phosphorus 32, which isn't right. It probably has a lot of other things in it, check what it's made of, and very little actual isotope.

I'm still digesting the other stuff.
 
  • Informative
Likes PSRB191921
  • #7
it would be easier to make a sketch of what you want to simulate
 
  • Like
Likes Alex A

Related to Optimize Filter Thickness with MCNP5 for Phosphorus 32 Bremsstrahlung

What is the primary goal of optimizing filter thickness in MCNP5 for Phosphorus 32 bremsstrahlung?

The primary goal is to determine the optimal thickness of a filter that maximizes the desired bremsstrahlung radiation while minimizing unwanted radiation and ensuring adequate protection. This optimization helps in improving the efficiency and safety of radiation applications involving Phosphorus 32.

Why is Phosphorus 32 used in bremsstrahlung radiation experiments?

Phosphorus 32 is a beta-emitting isotope commonly used in scientific and medical applications due to its ability to produce bremsstrahlung radiation when interacting with materials. Its relatively short half-life and high energy make it suitable for various experimental and therapeutic purposes.

How does MCNP5 help in optimizing filter thickness?

MCNP5 (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code) is a simulation tool used to model and analyze the transport of particles through different materials. By simulating the interaction of Phosphorus 32 with various filter materials and thicknesses, MCNP5 helps in predicting the resultant bremsstrahlung radiation and identifying the optimal filter configuration for specific applications.

What factors should be considered when selecting filter materials for Phosphorus 32 bremsstrahlung?

Factors to consider include the material's atomic number, density, and thickness, as these properties affect the attenuation and scattering of bremsstrahlung radiation. Additionally, the material's availability, cost, and compatibility with the experimental setup are important considerations.

Can you provide an example of a common filter material used in Phosphorus 32 bremsstrahlung experiments?

Lead is a common filter material used in Phosphorus 32 bremsstrahlung experiments due to its high atomic number and density, which provide effective attenuation of unwanted radiation. Other materials such as aluminum or copper may also be used depending on the specific requirements of the experiment.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
20
Views
16K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top