Optimizing Gear Train Simulation with Exponential Acceleration and Braking

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing a computer simulation for a three-gear train system, incorporating a fictitious motor and braking system activated by mouse clicks. The user employs exponential functions to model acceleration and deceleration, questioning if this approach is appropriate or if better equations exist. They emphasize the importance of defining the Torque to RPM curve for the motor and acknowledge energy losses that could affect RPM. The goal is to achieve a visually acceptable effect while considering the real equations for angular acceleration over time. Overall, the conversation highlights the balance between realistic physics and visual representation in gear simulations.
TechFan
Messages
34
Reaction score
1
Hi:
I'm building a computer simulation for a 3 gear train system. So far the gears rotate with mouse movement horizontally. Now I'm adding a fictitious motor and braking system to start/stop rotation with mouse clicks. I multiplied the rotation angle by [1-e(-t/TC)] to simulate exponential acceleration and e(-t/TC) for braking for exponential deceleration. Is exponential is the right way to do it? or is there any other better equation. This is just a simple case with no other external conditions influencing; but just the system inertia.
In general terms this is the equation I'm using.
Acceleration=[1-e(-t/TC)];// acceleration case
Acceleration=[e(-t/TC)];// braking case

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The meshed gears will have kinetic energy proportional to RPM squared.
The motor will provide that energy. You must specify the Torque to RPM curve for the motor.

Power = torque * RPM = watts = joules of energy per second.
Use that to compute the change in velocity over time as energy flows in or out.

There will be some energy losses that will remove energy and so reduce the RPM. Ignore them for now, or make them proportional to RPM.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi:
Interesting info. I'll experiment trying to code that somehow (?) and see the results. My goal is just having an acceptable "visual effect", although using the real equation will be much better.
The real question would be: What is the equation for the change in rpm with time (angular acceleration)? I assumed it to be exponential so it will tend to the end value asymptotically with time in both cases.
Thanks
 
Wow that is awesome!. Thanks.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?

Similar threads

Back
Top