Optimizing Linear Estimators for Minimum Variance: How to Find the Best Weights?

  • Thread starter Thread starter purplebird
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear
AI Thread Summary
To optimize linear estimators for minimum variance, the goal is to find weights W(i) such that the linear estimator μ = ΣW(i)X(i) has a mean equal to the parameter u and minimizes the variance of the estimate. The condition for the expected value E(μ) to equal u requires that the sum of the weights equals one (ΣW(i) = 1). The variance of the estimator can be expressed as Var(μ) = σ²ΣW(i)², which needs to be minimized under the constraint of the weights summing to one. The method of undetermined multipliers is suggested as a direct approach to achieve this optimization. This discussion highlights the mathematical framework necessary for deriving optimal weights in linear estimation.
purplebird
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Given
Y(i) = u + e(i) i = 1,2,...N
such that e(i)s are statistically independent and u is a parameter
mean of e(i) = 0
and variance = \sigma(i)^2

Find W(i) such that the linear estimator

\mu = \sumW(i)X(i) for i = 1 to N

has

mean value of \mu = u

and E[(u-\mu)^2 is a minimum
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There may be other ways to do this, but one of the most direct is outlined below.
<br /> \hat\mu = \sum w(i) x_i<br />
then in order for E(\hat \mu) = \mu to be true you must have

<br /> \sum w(i) = 1<br />

Next, note that E(\hat \mu - \mu)^2 is simply the \textbf{variance} of your estimate (since your estimate has expectation \mu).

Since the x_i are independent, the variance of \hat \mu is

<br /> \mathbf{Var}{\hat \mu} = \sum w(i)^2 \mathbf{Var}(x_i) = \sigma^2 \sum w(i)^2<br />

You want to choose the w(i) so that the most recent expression is minimized, subject to the constraint that \sum w(i) = 1

From here on use the method of undetermined multipliers.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top