Orbit that does not need maneuvering

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem involving the design of a satellite's elliptical orbit at 700 km altitude, specifically focusing on maintaining the orbit without the need for maneuvers. The user attempts to analyze the effects of J2 perturbations and explores the relationship between the orbital elements, particularly the inclinations and their impact on maneuvering requirements. Despite calculating certain values, the user expresses uncertainty about whether the effects of the right ascension of the ascending node (Ω) can counteract the argument of perigee (ω) and whether a different altitude might be more suitable. The need for further clarification and guidance on these concepts is emphasized, highlighting the complexity of orbital mechanics. The discussion seeks assistance to better understand the feasibility of a no-maneuver orbit.
Imagin_e
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi!

This is a textbook problem that I need help with (I want to practice as much as I can before the exams) and I hope that there is someone who can guide me. The question is:
You’re doing a first-order analysis on a new satellite in an elliptical (e = 0.2) orbit at 700 km altitude. Can you design the orbit so no maneuvers are necessary to maintain it? Hint: consider secular J2 perturbations only – can the effects of Ω counteract with ω? If it can’t be done at 700 km, is another altitude feasible?

Homework Equations


See below

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the following equations (for J2 perturbations) :
upload_2016-10-16_21-36-42.png


And for p and n:
upload_2016-10-16_21-36-36.png


I inserted n and p into the first two equations and got:

upload_2016-10-16_21-37-26.png


I assumed that they were all constant, so I ended up with:
upload_2016-10-16_21-39-17.png
upload_2016-10-16_21-39-31.png


And this gave me of i1 = 90° and i2=63°. If we have these inclinations then there is no need for maneuvering. And now for the next question:

The next question to answer is can the effects of Ω counteract with ω? If it can’t be done at 700 km, is another altitude feasible? I have no idea how to answer this question.

As you can see I may be completely lost. I don't see my solution feasible since it doesn't actually answer the question about the no maneuvering bit. Anyone that can help me? Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone that can help? : (
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top