Orientation of Lowest Energy Photons from Hydrogen

  • Thread starter Thread starter HarryWertM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
HarryWertM
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
What is the orientation of a photon emitted by an atom? By orientation, I mean the direction of the photon's travel relative to the orbital axis of the electron. Consider only the lowest energy photons from Hydrogen atoms. I am sure I would not understand anything more complex.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, my own best answer... There are no "planar" orbits in modern atomic theory which might - might, as far as I know - be the "standing wave model" in which there is no way to define an orbital axis and thus no orientation for an emitted photon.

This leaves much for a civilian to wonder about. In particular, I read somewhere - don't ask where - that the lowest energy wave function for a hydrogen electron oscillates back and forth directly through the nucleus. This obviously defines an orientation which in turn might define some experimental observables for photon absorption. Like in frozen hydrogen? What kinds of results can be predicted if a sample of frozen hydrogen is zapped in the new attosecond x-ray laser at SLAC?

Behind this particular subject is the more sense of just how much "reality" there is in modern physics. There seems no end to experimental phenomena of uncertain predictability as well as no end to new theories. Does anybody really understand anything?
 
HarryWertM said:
What is the orientation of a photon emitted by an atom? By orientation, I mean the direction of the photon's travel relative to the orbital axis of the electron. Consider only the lowest energy photons from Hydrogen atoms. I am sure I would not understand anything more complex.
There isn't, it's indeterminate. If you measure the atom's recoil, *then* you can say that the photon took the opposite direction (entanglement), but with many repetitions of the experiment you would find all possible directions.
 
Photons get emitted when electrons in atoms transition from higher energy states to lower energy states. There are many different transitions an atom can undergo depending on which energy state it starts in. Photons emitted in a given transition are more likely to go in some directions than others. As you note, for one direction to be more probable than another requires something to pick out a special direction--this is done by the angular momentum of the atom, which points in a certain direction (even though the electrons don't have well-defined "orbits").

HarryWertM said:
There seems no end to experimental phenomena of uncertain predictability as well as no end to new theories. Does anybody really understand anything?

Quantum mechanics is very well understood. It simply predicts probabilities instead of certainties when you measure certain quantities, and gives mathematical reasons why this is the best you can do. Certainly there are plenty of theories about many poorly-understood phenomena, but as http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2010/09/23/the-laws-underlying-the-physics-of-everyday-life-are-completely-understood/" points out, "the laws underlying the physics of everyday life are completely understood."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top