Orthogonality of Legendre Polynomials

AI Thread Summary
Legendre Polynomials are essential for spherical coordinates, and the discussion focuses on their orthogonality and normalization. The first three polynomials, P0(x), P1(x), and P2(x), need to be graphed, and their orthogonality must be demonstrated through three integrals. The integration should confirm that the functions are orthogonal for distinct indices, yielding a result of 1 when indices are equal, consistent with the normalization stated in the relevant equation. The theta terms in the equations are deemed irrelevant for this specific evaluation, as they primarily pertain to Spherical Harmonics. Clarification and confirmation of the integration process are sought to ensure accuracy in the results.
xxbigelxx
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For spherical coordinates, we will need to use Legendre Polynomials,
a.Sketch graphs of the first 3 – P0(x), P1(x), and P2(x).

b.Evaluate the orthogonality relationship (eq 3.68) to show these 3 functions are
orthogonal to each other. (3 integrals).

c.Show that the normalization result is 2/2l+1 as stated in eq 3.68.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I believe I got part a, but I am unsure how to do the rest. I don't see where the equation that has the theta terms, comes into use.
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 468
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation with the theta terms is irrelevant. It is there to show the main application, namely Spherical Harmonics. You just need to carry out the integration to show you get 0 for distinct l,l' and 1 (with the given normalization) if l = l'.
 
Ahh ok I was wondering this. I realized maybe this was the case a few minutes ago, and tried to work it out. Here is what I just did. I think this is correct... Any thoughts are appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Scan.jpg
    Scan.jpg
    14.1 KB · Views: 461
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top