Orthogonality Problem (From Fourier Analysis Text)

GridironCPJ
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I'm working through a majority of the problems in "A First Course in Wavelets with Fourier Analysis" and have stumbled upon a problem I'm having difficulty with. Please view the PDF attachment, it shows the problem and what I have done with it so far.

Once you have seen the problem and my work so far, what do you suggest I do for the next step? I thought about using the definition of the space D and setting everything less than or equal to the double integral of 1^(j+k_/2, which is just the double integral of 1 and you get xy, then I'm at a dead end, so perhaps that's not the correct route. Your ideas would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Before you dive into the math, think what these functions look like geometrically. The region is the unit circle...

You should be able to see "why" it is true geometrically, and therefore see how to prove it before you start writing down integrals.

(Hint: the word "circle" is in bold)
 
Another approach: You may also want to consider using the Cauchy-Goursat theorem, if you're familiar with it.

Think also of the exponential rep. e. Maybe this is what Aleph was suggesting.

BTW, your factorization is incorrect.

And, sorry to nitpick,but you're not really letting your θn's be in L2(D); they are there already; you're letting your θn's be given by (x+iy)n

EDIT: Cauchy-Goursat does not apply here, since the product function is not analytic.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I realized earlier that my expansion was incorrect. I used polar coordinates, so we start with

∫∫[(rcosθ+irsinθ)^j(rcosθ-rsinθ)^k]rdrdθ

From here I integrated with respect to r first and then I pulled in out and was left with

[r^(j+k+2)/j+k+2]∫(cosθ+isinθ)^j(cosθ-isinθ)^k dθ

where j≠k. I am not sure exactly how to proceed. Is there an expansion of (x+iy)^j(x-iy)^k that I am not thinking of? The value in the integrand will have the form cosθ^j+k+" "+/-isinθ^j+k, where the " " represents combinations of sinθcosθ's, which integrate to zero. So I'm left with the first and last terms, which should be zero if θ=∏, correct?

If my method or logic is not optimal, please point me in the right direction.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top