- #1
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
- 3,998
- 48
I am reading Sheldon Axler's book: Measure, Integration & Real Analysis ... and I am focused on Chapter 2: Measures ...
I need help with the proof of Result 2.14 ...
Result 2.14 and its proof read as follows:
In the above proof by Axler we read the following:
" ... ... We will now prove by induction on n that the inclusion above implies that \(\displaystyle \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a\)This will then imply that \(\displaystyle \sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l(I_k) \geq \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a\), completing the proof that \(\displaystyle \mid [a, b] \mid \ \geq b - a\). ... ... "Can someone please explain exactly why \(\displaystyle \sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l(I_k) \ \geq \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a\) completes the proof that \(\displaystyle \mid [a, b] \mid \ \geq b - a\). ... ...
Indeed ... can someone please show, formally and rigorously, that \(\displaystyle \sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l(I_k) \ \geq \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a\) implies that \(\displaystyle \mid [a, b] \mid \geq b - a\). ... ...
Help will be much appreciated ... ...
Peter=============================================================================================================
Readers of the above post may be assisted by access to Axler's definition of the length of an open interval and his definition of outer measure ... so I am providing access to the relevant text ... as follows:
Hope that helps ...
Peter
I need help with the proof of Result 2.14 ...
Result 2.14 and its proof read as follows:
In the above proof by Axler we read the following:
" ... ... We will now prove by induction on n that the inclusion above implies that \(\displaystyle \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a\)This will then imply that \(\displaystyle \sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l(I_k) \geq \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a\), completing the proof that \(\displaystyle \mid [a, b] \mid \ \geq b - a\). ... ... "Can someone please explain exactly why \(\displaystyle \sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l(I_k) \ \geq \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a\) completes the proof that \(\displaystyle \mid [a, b] \mid \ \geq b - a\). ... ...
Indeed ... can someone please show, formally and rigorously, that \(\displaystyle \sum_{ k = 1 }^{ \infty } l(I_k) \ \geq \sum_{ k = 1 }^n l(I_k) \ \geq b - a\) implies that \(\displaystyle \mid [a, b] \mid \geq b - a\). ... ...
Help will be much appreciated ... ...
Peter=============================================================================================================
Readers of the above post may be assisted by access to Axler's definition of the length of an open interval and his definition of outer measure ... so I am providing access to the relevant text ... as follows:
Hope that helps ...
Peter
Last edited: