- #1
raxp
- 11
- 3
- TL;DR Summary
- Parcel theory holds that the reason hot air rises is that its density is lower than the surrounding cold air, leading to Archimedean buoyancy. While this explanation is perfectly reasonable for a hot air balloon where there is a mechanical interface between the hot and cold gas, for warm and cold regions of an ideal gas, there can be no mechanical interface between the two.
Parcel theory holds that as air is heated, it expands. Its density hence decreases and the hot air "floats" upwards, pushed by the colder, more dense air surrounding it.
It is an experimental fact that hot air rises, but the explanation from buoyancy seems suspect. In a gas, all motions are uncorrelated, and the collision cross-section for each molecule is minuscule. How can there then be a mechanical force exerted between two regions of the same gas, differing only in their temperature? Each single molecule does not "know" to which parcel it belongs and may pass freely between them, unlike the case where there is some mechanical interface (the fabric of a hot air ballon, say) between the two regions.
It is an experimental fact that hot air rises, but the explanation from buoyancy seems suspect. In a gas, all motions are uncorrelated, and the collision cross-section for each molecule is minuscule. How can there then be a mechanical force exerted between two regions of the same gas, differing only in their temperature? Each single molecule does not "know" to which parcel it belongs and may pass freely between them, unlike the case where there is some mechanical interface (the fabric of a hot air ballon, say) between the two regions.