Particle Number Operator (Hermitian?)

Mimb8
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Particle Number Operator (Hermitian??)

Hey guys,

I'm studying the quantic harmonic oscillator and I'm using "Cohen-Tannoudji Quantum Mechanics Volume 1".

At some point he introduced the particle number operator, N, such that:

N=a+.a , where a+ is the conjugate operator of a.

The line of proof that they used to show that N is hermitian is the following:

N+=a+.(a+)+=N , where N+ is the conjugate operator of N.

Somehow, in ways I cannot understand, this proves it.

But everytime I try and prove it myself I get to the conclusion that N is not hermitian.

Can someone be kind enough and help me with this :)

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mimb8 said:
The line of proof that they used to show that N is hermitian is the following:

N+=a+.(a+)+=N , where N+ is the conjugate operator of N.

Did you mean to write this? It should be N^+ = (a^+ a)+ = a+ (a+)+ = a+ a = N.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi George,

I'm not sure I get the transition:

(a+. a)+=a+.(a+)+

Back me up here, if I have the operator (AB) and I apply the conjugate it gives me:

(AB)+=A+.B+

Right?

(I seem to be missing something really obvious here :s)
 
Mimb8 said:
(AB)+=A+.B+

No, (AB)+ = B+ A+
 
George Jones said:
No, (AB)+ = B+ A+


Oh...I seem to have misread that property (shame on me).

Thank you :)
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top