MHB Perfect Cube & Square: 5-Digit Number

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Square
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
Find 5-digit number whose half is a perfect cube and one-third is a perfect square
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kaliprasad said:
Find 5-digit number whose half is a perfect cube and one-third is a perfect square

$$2^{10}\cdot3^3=27648$$
 
greg1313 said:
$$2^{10}\cdot3^3=27648$$

right ans . here is my method

the number is $2n^3a^6= 3m^2a^6$ ( we can choose m, n to be as low as possible)
now $n^3$ and $m^2$ shall be of the form $2^a3^b$ say $n = 2^x3^y$ and $m = 2^p3^q$

so we get $2^{3x+1}3^{3y} = 2^{2p} 3^{2q+1}$
comparing exponents on both sides $3x + 1 = 2p$ givinng $x = 1 , p = 2$
and $3y = 2q + 1$ giving $y = q = 1$
so $n = 2 * (2 * 3)^3 = 432$
$\frac{10000}{432} = 23$ and $\frac{100000}{432} = 231$ and 64 is the only $6^{th}$ power between 23 and 231 is $2^6 = 64$
hence $ans = 64n = 432 * 64 = 27648$
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top