Photoelectric effect and mercury

AI Thread Summary
The photoelectric effect does not occur when mercury is illuminated with UV light at a wavelength of 300 nm, as this wavelength exceeds the cutoff of 250 nm, indicating lower energy and frequency. The relationship between wavelength and energy shows that longer wavelengths correspond to lower energy, which is insufficient to eject electrons. For calculating the cutoff frequency of an x-ray tube operating at 44 kV, the correct conversion from kV to eV is essential, as 1 kV equals 1,000 eV. The formula used for frequency, which involves the work function and Planck's constant, may yield incorrect results if the energy conversion is mishandled. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the conditions under which the photoelectric effect can occur.
stickplot
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a. Does the photoelectric effect take place if mercury is illuminated with UV light with a wavelength λ = 300 nm? The cutoff wavelength for mercury is 250 nm.


Homework Equations



ft= WF/h(planks constant)
E=h(f)

The Attempt at a Solution



im not sure how to start this because the work function is not given and neither is the frequency i know that i can get the work function if i have the frequency by multiplying it with planks constant, but I am not sure how to get it with just the wavelength.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are given the cut off wavelength, and wavelength and frequency are related.
But you don't need to calculate anything - just a bit of reasoning.

Your light is longer wavelength than the cut off, is this higher or lower energy?
Which would it have to be to eject an electron?
 
o ok, so this means that the energy is lower because the frequency would be lower, so photoelectric effect would not take place. is that right?
 
Correct, longer wavelength = lower frequency = lower energy
So no emmission
 
alright thanks
 
How would you calculate the cutoff frequency of an x-ray tube operating at 44kV? I am using frequency = work function/h. I have (44000eV x 1.602E-19J)/1.626E-34 but my answer is wrong. I'm thinking that I converted kV to eV incorrectly, but I'm not sure.
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top