Photoelectric effect experiment: is current proportional to charging time?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the photoelectric effect, highlighting that the stopping voltage is proportional to the frequency of incident radiation rather than its intensity, which affects current. The experiment's setup measures the charging time required to reach the stopping potential, raising the question of whether charging time is proportional to current. It is clarified that charging time is inversely proportional to current, meaning higher current results in shorter charging times. The relationship between current and charging time is suggested to be exponential, particularly due to the nature of capacitor charging. Overall, the data indicates a more complex relationship than a simple linear correlation.
quantumtimeleap
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm not really sure where to put this question, but definitely this is just an introductory physics coursework. Let me refresh you first with the basics of the photoelectric effect.

We all know that in the photoelectric effect the stopping voltage is just the kinetic energy obtained by the electrons displaced by the photons that struck the photodiode. Usually we experimentally measure the maximum stopping voltage because we only know the work function of the metal, which is the minimum energy needed to displace an electron from the surface.

The main result of the experiment is that the stopping voltage is proportional to the frequency of the incident radiation, and not correlated whatsoever to its intensity. Instead, it is the current generated that should be directly proportional to intensity, since intensity is simply the amount of photons carried by a light beam (and more photons incident on the metal means more electrons displaced --> higher current).

Also, the experiment includes measuring the charging time needed to achieve the stopping potential. This is the apparatus we used: ( http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~c173_608/photoelectric/he9370.pdf ). I'm pretty sure most photoelectric effect experiments use something similar, such that the stopping voltage is achieved after a nonzero charging time in the circuits of the apparatus.

My question is this: Is the charging time proportional to the current? One thing for sure is that the current is correlated to the charging time. More electrons received by the anode by the displacing effect of the photons should mean a faster time to achieve the stopping potential. I'm afraid of my hunches, but I think the relationship is probably not linear even disregarding noise and random error. Can anyone give me a definite yes or no? Thank you in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Long story, short answer: Current is charge per time, so: no, charging time is inversely proportional to current. As you remarked correctly: more current -> shorter time.
 
I would think that it will be an exponential relationship since you are dealing with the charging of a capacitor. You can use your data to investigate it. Play around with the % transmitted and the charging time data.
 
Last edited:
thank you, everyone! the data did turn out exhibiting something more complicated than a simple linear relationship ## I = k \frac{1}{\Delta t} ## for a proportionality constant k.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top