Photos of the our milky way galaxy

AI Thread Summary
Photos of the Milky Way and other galaxies are captured using sophisticated telescopes that collect light over extended periods, allowing for detailed images of distant celestial bodies. Observing our galaxy in its entirety is impossible since we are located within it, but parts can be seen as a band of stars in the night sky. The Hubble Space Telescope, for instance, achieved the Hubble Deep Field images by focusing on a small area of the sky for about 30-40 hours, equivalent to 150 orbits around Earth. Ground-based telescopes can also capture faint objects but are limited by atmospheric conditions and cannot maintain long exposures like space telescopes. Patience and time are crucial for obtaining these stunning astronomical images.
yalgaar
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I have seen several photos of the our milky way galaxy, other galaxies and some photos of even 100's of galaxies in the same picture.

How do they do it? Usually if you see in the sky, all you see is the stars. (naked eyes)
I believe to be able to see actual of our milky way galaxy we need to be very very far from it; but we are part of it. How can we see it even with the best telescopes?

I have read there are highly sophisticated telescopes that watches the space for quite a long time to get a picture of 100s of galaxies but would like some detailes explanation on how is it done?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


You have never seen a picture of any more then a portion of a arm of our galaxy. That is all we can see, any images of OUR galaxy that you have seen must be an artists rendition.

Other galaxies are easy, just point a large telescope at the sky and let it soak up light for a while. How long a while, I am not sure.
 


You can't see the whole of our galaxy because we are in it .
You can see part of the galaxy (from us to the centre) - on a dark site in the south it looks like a wide band of stars, like a cloud across the sky.
Photographs can show up many 1000s more stars and so make it look more solid.
 


Exactly like Integral said, to get images of 100's of galaxies you just point your telescope at one part of the sky for a long long time.

One of my professors in astronomy was involved in the Hubble Deep Field observations, which basically consisted of taking the HST and pointing it at one patch in the sky for about 150 orbits around the earth. The result is this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/HubbleDeepField.800px.jpg

It doesn't really take a sophisticated telescope, just a lot of patience :)
 


Nabeshin said:
Exactly like Integral said, to get images of 100's of galaxies you just point your telescope at one part of the sky for a long long time.

One of my professors in astronomy was involved in the Hubble Deep Field observations, which basically consisted of taking the HST and pointing it at one patch in the sky for about 150 orbits around the earth. The result is this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5f/HubbleDeepField.800px.jpg

It doesn't really take a sophisticated telescope, just a lot of patience :)

Thanks for all your answers. This picture is really cool. Could you please explain what does it mean by "long long time" I am sorry I really don't know much about telescopes. I believe when you look at a telescope you see stuff. What difference it makes if you see it for longer time?

Also what does it mean by "150 orbits around the earth"?
 


The Hubble deep field (the above image) is about 30-40 hour exposure in each of 4 colours.
Scientific cameras are black+white with a filter to select the colour.

The telescope (HST) is in space and it took about 10days to make all the exposures, during which the telescope orbited the Earth 150 times.
Ground based telescopes are larger and in some colours can see fainter object (although with less sharpness) but they can't observe the same point for 40hours at a time - dawn gets in the way!
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top