Physics Geniuses: Mirrors;How many images Produced?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the number of images produced by two mirrors positioned at an angle of 72 degrees. The correct formula for calculating the number of images is n = (360/θ) - 1, leading to a total of 4 images when applied. Participants debate the reasoning behind the calculations, with some confusion about the role of line tracing in visualizing image formation. Resources for understanding ray tracing techniques are suggested, including textbooks and online materials. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding the geometry and physics behind mirror reflections.
TipTip
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the following diagram, why not 6 images are produced? Explain thoroughly. And mention the amount of images produced.

Problem Image:

http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/8315/imageproduced.jpg

or
http://file15.9q9q.net/preview/92743229/Image-Produced.jpg.htmlPlease Answer thoroughly and if possible, please include a sketch of

the amount of images produced.

If you can solve this, then you are a REAL Genius.

Thanks.

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I tried to project the images and I got 6 images, one from each mirror. another two from the imaginary mirror of the two mirrors and another 2 from that reflected mirror. But actually our phd professor told me that it is less than 6.TipTip
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any solution?
 
If you had one mirror, how many images would you expect?
 
one mirror = one image
 
TipTip said:
one mirror = one image

Correct. And it doesn't matter where the object is in relation to the mirror, I should still only see 1 image, right?
 
The only thing that matters for finding the number of images produced, when there are two mirrors, is the angle between the mirrors. The formula needed is given by

<br /> n=\frac{360^\circ}{\theta}-1<br />

So in your problem, \theta=72^\circ. Using the formula:

<br /> n=\frac{360}{72}-1=5-1=4<br />

Now does this answer make sense? There should be 1 image produced from each of the two mirrors (2 images). Then the two images each create one more image (4 images total now). I briefly searched and found a diagram showing the line tracing, but it is for mirrors at 90^\circ so it's not really the same problem:
http://electron9.phys.utk.edu/optics421/modules/m1/images/Image1309.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Still. the correct answer is 5 but I don't know the reason
 
TipTip said:
Still. the correct answer is 5 but I don't know the reason

I believe your professor is erroneous. There are 5 total objects, but 4 of them are images. I found a good java applet online to show you how and where the images are created:
http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/ntnujava/index.php?topic=569.0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually, no, that applet is not correct, based [1], number of images produced by hinged mirrors at an angle "x" can be found using:

1. If 180°/q = x, an integer then the number of image formed, N = 2x-1, regardless of where the object is.
2. If 180°/q = x + 0.5, number of images formed , N = 2x when the object lies on the angle bisector and N = 2x+1 on other positions.
3. If 180°/q = x + n/q and n/q < 0.5 then the number of images formed, N = 2x with the location of the object anywhere on the central angular sector of (q-2n)° about the angle bisector. N = 2x+1 when the object lies outside of the given sector.
4. If 180°/q = x + n/q and n/q > 0.5 then the number of images formed, N = 2x + 2 with the location of the object anywhere on the central angular sector of (2n-q)° about the angle bisector. N = 2x + 1 when the object lies outside of the given sector. if we use equation 2, then we get 2.5= 2*2+1 = 5 images.

What I want to know, why is this so.

[1] V. M. Kulkarni. "Number of Images Produced by Multiple Reflection".American Journal of Physics Volume 28 (1960): 317-318
 
  • #10
TipTip said:
Actually, no, that applet is not correct, based [1], number of images produced by hinged mirrors at an angle "x" can be found using:

1. If 180°/q = x, an integer then the number of image formed, N = 2x-1, regardless of where the object is.
2. If 180°/q = x + 0.5, number of images formed , N = 2x when the object lies on the angle bisector and N = 2x+1 on other positions.
3. If 180°/q = x + n/q and n/q < 0.5 then the number of images formed, N = 2x with the location of the object anywhere on the central angular sector of (q-2n)° about the angle bisector. N = 2x+1 when the object lies outside of the given sector.
4. If 180°/q = x + n/q and n/q > 0.5 then the number of images formed, N = 2x + 2 with the location of the object anywhere on the central angular sector of (2n-q)° about the angle bisector. N = 2x + 1 when the object lies outside of the given sector.


if we use equation 2, then we get 2.5= 2*2+1 = 5 images.

What I want to know, why is this so.

[1] V. M. Kulkarni. "Number of Images Produced by Multiple Reflection".American Journal of Physics Volume 28 (1960): 317-318

You can actually move the object around in between the mirrors, so the applet really is correct. Moving the object closer to the side, there are 5 images produced as you anticipated.

I had never seen any of the 4 above equations before, I have only ever seen the one equation I wrote.

The reason why there are any images produced comes from line tracing, which the applet does for you. If you check the box next to 'initialize' you will see the rays traced out that show where each image comes from as well as the two 'image' mirrors that exist. But the basic idea is still line tracing.
 
  • #11
Well, yes you are right.
Now, I do understand how to find number of images but still I don't get the line tracing thing.
I contacted Dr Walter H.G. Lewin, Physics MIT lecturer, but unfortunately he replied that my question requires more than 10 minutes of his time and that's why he can't answer me.
 
  • #12
TipTip said:
Well, yes you are right.
Now, I do understand how to find number of images but still I don't get the line tracing thing.
I contacted Dr Walter H.G. Lewin, Physics MIT lecturer, but unfortunately he replied that my question requires more than 10 minutes of his time and that's why he can't answer me.

There are books aplenty on ray tracing techniques. Any Introduction to Optics textbook (Pedrotti, Pedrotti, Pedrotti comes to mind first) should give ample information how how ray tracing works. A pdf I found after a quick google search of 'ray tracing planar mirrors optics' might help introduce the idea in a few minutes worth of reading http://www.physnet.org/modules/pdf_modules/m260.pdf
 
Back
Top