Pigging or Flushing a 15 km Non-Uniform Pipeline

  • Thread starter Thread starter Finchh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    cleaning Pressure
AI Thread Summary
Guidance is sought for cleaning a 15 km non-uniform pipeline with alternating 4" and 6" sections, facing a pressure loss of approximately 30 bar at a flow velocity of 1 m/s. The pipeline lacks vent points, raising concerns about air displacement during flushing and pigging operations. The discussion includes evaluating pigging options, such as dual-diameter pigs, and flushing setups to manage air effectively. Additionally, there are inquiries about pump requirements to maintain the necessary pressure head for the pipeline configuration. The conversation highlights the challenges of cleaning without pig traps and the implications of the pipeline's design on cleaning methods.
Finchh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I’m looking for some guidance on cleaning a 15 km non-uniform pipeline that alternates between 4" and 6" Schedule 80 sections, with reducers, bends, and a non-barred tee section (P&ID attached for reference). We’ve calculated a total pressure loss of approximately 30 bar at a flow velocity of 1 m/s, accounting for friction, bends, and head loss. There are no vent points available, so air displacement is a concern for both flushing and pigging operations.

Pipeline Details:​

  • Length: 15 km
  • Diameters: Alternating 4" and 6" Schedule 80 sections
  • Pressure Loss: Around 30 bar at 1 m/s flow velocity
  • Tee Section: Non-barred tee included in the line
  • Vent Points: None available
Given the diameter transitions and the non-barred tee section, I’m evaluating both pigging and flushing options. If anyone has insights on handling non-uniform lines with tees in terms of pig selection (such as dual-diameter or adaptable pigs) or advice on flushing setups to manage air displacement without vent points, I’d appreciate it. Additionally, any suggestions on pump requirements to consistently achieve the 30 bar head for this configuration would be extremely helpful.

Thanks in advance for your input!
6 & 4 inch line.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have no experience with pigging, but does it work with such small diameter pipes and varying diameters like this? (not to mention such tight turns)
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top