Pipe Design - One Inlet, 3 Outlets

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a pipe design problem with one inlet and three outlets, aiming to determine pressures and velocities at various states in the system. The user has outlined known parameters and assumptions, including steady, inviscid, incompressible, and irrotational flow. Key concerns include the accuracy of head loss calculations, the applicability of Bernoulli's principle across branching flows, and the need for boundary conditions to achieve a unique solution. Suggestions include using the Newton-Raphson method for complex pipe networks to aid in calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of establishing a comprehensive system of equations to relate the states effectively.
TBen24
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Any tips for solving this would be greatly appreciated. Thank you all for your time and help

The schematic of the problem is in the attached PDF

PROBLEM INFORMATION
I’m trying to determine the equations to solve for the conditions at 1, 2, and 3 when they are at a given length in their respective pipe. I need to solve for the pressures and velocities at states 0 – 3. Also, the gaps between the pipe branches are considerably larger than the drawing shows. In other words, the drawing is not to scale. I don’t need numbers specifically, just help on setting up the system of equations.

KNOWN
Gravity, density, roughness, kinetic energy correction factor, size of duct (all areas, lengths, and diameters)

SOLUTION ATTEMPT
Notes: Q is volumetric flow rate, epsilon is roughness, mu is viscosity, alpha is kinetic energy correction factor
Assumptions: Steady flow, inviscid flow, incompressible flow, and irrotational flow.

Converse mass
Q0 = V0*A0, Q1 = V1*A1, Q2 = V2*A2, Q3 = V3*A3
Q0 = Q1+Q2+Q3

Friction Factors
Re0 = (rho*V0*D0)/mu, Re1 = (rho*V1*D1)/mu, Re2 = (rho*V2*D2)/mu, Re3 = (rho*V3*D3)/mu
1/sqrt(f0) = -2.0*log((epsilon/D0)/3.7+2.51/(Re0*sqrt(f0)))
1/sqrt(f1) = -2.0*log((epsilon/D1)/3.7+2.51/(Re1*sqrt(f1)))
1/sqrt(f2) = -2.0*log((epsilon/D2)/3.7+2.51/(Re2*sqrt(f2)))
1/sqrt(f3) = -2.0*log((epsilon/D3)/3.7+2.51/(Re3*sqrt(f3)))

Head Losses
HL1 = f0*(L01/D0)*(V0^2/(2*g))+(f1*(L1/D1)+K1)*(V1^2/(2*g))
HL2 = f0*(L02/D0)*(V0^2/(2*g))+(f2*(L2/D2)+K2)*(V2^2/(2*g))
HL3 = f0*(L03/D0)*(V0^2/(2*g))+(f3*(L3/D3)+K3)*(V3^2/(2*g))
K1 is caused by branched tee flow in tee 1
K2 is caused by straight flow through tee 1 and branched flow through tee 2
K3 is caused by straight flow through tees 1 and 2 and branched flow in tee 3

Analysis
Based on the current setup, there will most likely be more unknowns than equations. In addition, pressure is not solved for at any of the states. I still need to relate the states.

Concerns and Questions
1) Is the head loss done correctly?
2) Can Bernoulli be applied between the various states to conserve energy? Specifically can it be applied between states 0 --> 1, 0 --> 2, and 0 --> 3 using the balances shown below despite the flow branching in several pipes?
P0/(rho*g)+alpha*(V0^2/(2*g))+L1 = P1/(rho*g)+alpha*(V1^2/(2*g))+HL1
P0/(rho*g)+alpha*(V0^2/(2*g))+L2 = P2/(rho*g)+alpha*(V2^2/(2*g))+HL2
P0/(rho*g)+alpha*(V0^2/(2*g))+L3 = P3/(rho*g)+alpha*(V3^2/(2*g))+HL3
3) Are the head losses equal because they are parallel? I personally do not think that they are because there are large gaps separating the branches?
4) Should I solve for pressure loss using head loss if the energy balance is not valid?

Thank you all again
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
As far as I can tell everything you have there is fine. The one thing you are missing are the boundary conditions. As you have 4 boundaries (ends of pipes) to calculate a unique solution to your problem you will need 4 boundary conditions (flows or heads).

Rich
 
One of the best ways to calculate complicated pipe networks is to use Newton-Raphson method >> http://www.firavia.com/Newton.html
this will help you hopefully .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top