MHB Please check Laguerre's eqtn solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter ognik
  • Start date Start date
ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
Hi - revising Sturm-Liouville theory and would appreciate someone checking & correcting/improving the following.

Given Laguerre's eqtn $xy''+(1-x)y'+\lambda y = 0 $, which is not self-adjoint, find the weighting factor w(x).

If I didn't know the integrating factor, would one be $ \mu(x) = \frac{1}{x} e^{\int\frac{1-x}{x}dx} = \frac{1}{x}\left( x-e^{x} \right)$? As it is I know $\mu(x) = e^{-x}$ works well.

Then $ e^{-x} xy''+ e^{-x} (1-x)y'+ e^{-x} \lambda y = 0 $ and I verify this is self-adjoint by showing $p'_0$ = $p_1$

Then by comparison with the Sturm-Liouville problem $ \mathcal{L}y + \lambda W(x)y = 0 $, I can write:
$q(x) = 0$
$\lambda$ is the eigenvalue and y(x) is the corresponding eigenfunction
and $w(x) = e^{-x}$

Anything I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi - the reason I ask questions like this is that over this year some things I thought were right have been - to some degree - wrong or incomplete or just using incorrect notation. So if I have this correct I would really appreciate a short confirmation; but am also interested in my 1st question about the Integration Factor - it would seem there can be more than 1 I/F ?
Thanks.
 
ognik said:
. . . $ \mu(x) = \frac{1}{x} e^{\int\frac{1-x}{x}dx} = \frac{1}{x}\left( x-e^{x} \right)$?
You might want to check what you did after you integrated.
 
Sorry, this was ambiguous. After I integrated I didn't use the IF that I had found, because I had used an IF of $e^{-x}$ in a different Laguerre's eqtn problem and it looked easier to work with than the IF I found by integrating.

I just want to confirm that there can be multiple different IFs for a function - i.e. integrating is just one method to find 1 possibility?

Secondly, using the easier IF of $e^{-x}$, I just wanted to check that I had applied the S-L theory correctly (book doesn't give the answer)

Thanks
 
What I'm saying is that after your integration, your simplifaction is incorrect.

$$\dfrac{e^{\int\frac{1-x}{x}dx}}{x} = \dfrac{e^{ln x - x}}{x} = \dfrac{x e^{-x}}{x} = e^{-x}$$

(I've also be a little relaxed with absolutes).
 
Oops misunderstood, you're of course right. So is there then only 1 IF that will make a function self-adjoint?

And please check that the rest of what I did is correct?
 
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...

Similar threads

Back
Top