Plots of B•dl as a function of position along the closed path

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the plot of B•dl along a closed triangular path around two infinitely long current-carrying wires. Participants emphasize the application of Ampère's law, which relates the closed path integral of B•dl to the enclosed current. The right-hand rule (RHR) is used to ascertain the direction of B in relation to the path segments, which affects whether B•dl is positive or negative. Clarification is provided that the direction of the path does not align with the direction of the current, as the current flows into the page while the path direction is indicated by arrows. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately plotting B•dl along the specified path.
syhpui2
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two infinitely long current carrying wires run into the page as indicated. Consider a closed triangular path that runs from point 1 to point 2 to point 3 and back to point 1 as shown.
Which of the following plots best shows B•dl as a function of position along the closed path?

J7b5L.png



http://i.imgur.com/J7b5L.png

Homework Equations




miu*I= B•dl

The Attempt at a Solution



I used RHR.I am confused about when should it is positive and when is negative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
syhpui2 said:
I used RHR.I am confused about when should it is positive and when is negative.

Ampère's law states that:

\oint _P \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} = \mu_0 I_{enc}
The left is a closed path integral. In other words, assuming that the path is closed, the total area under the curve of \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} is proportional to the current enclosed within the path. How much current is enclosed within the path? That should rule out one of the choices right there.

Pick a path component and note the direction of \vec{dl} (the corresponding arrow in the figure will show you the direction of \vec{dl}). Use the right hand rule to determine the direction of \vec B. For that path, is the direction of \vec B in the same general direction of \vec{dl} (making \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} positive)? Or are they generally in the opposite direction (making \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} negative)? As a sanity check, repeat for the other path components.
 
collinsmark said:
Ampère's law states that:

\oint _P \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} = \mu_0 I_{enc}
The left is a closed path integral. In other words, assuming that the path is closed, the total area under the curve of \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} is proportional to the current enclosed within the path. How much current is enclosed within the path? That should rule out one of the choices right there.

Pick a path component and note the direction of \vec{dl} (the corresponding arrow in the figure will show you the direction of \vec{dl}). Use the right hand rule to determine the direction of \vec B. For that path, is the direction of \vec B in the same general direction of \vec{dl} (making \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} positive)? Or are they generally in the opposite direction (making \vec B \cdot \vec{dl} negative)? As a sanity check, repeat for the other path components.

So the direction of path is same as direction of current?
Thanks!
 
syhpui2 said:
So the direction of path is same as direction of current?
Thanks!
Um no. :rolleyes: The direction of the current is into the board/paper, as indicated by the 'x's on the wires. The direction of \vec{dl} of each path segment is shown by the arrows on each path segment. (All of that is given to you in the problem statement.) You can determine the direction of \vec{B} by using the right hand rule. (Hint: the direction of \vec{B} is perpendicular to the current in the infinitely long wires. But you need to think in three dimensions.)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top