Point of Demarcation between Quantum and Classical Behavior

  • I
  • Thread starter Twodogs
  • Start date
In summary, the "Point of Demarcation between Quantum and Classical Behavior" refers to the critical threshold that distinguishes quantum mechanics, which describes the behavior of particles at microscopic scales, from classical physics, which governs macroscopic phenomena. This demarcation is typically characterized by the transition from quantum superpositions and entanglement to deterministic classical states, influenced by factors such as scale, measurement, and decoherence. Understanding this boundary is essential for exploring the fundamental principles of physics and the nature of reality.
  • #1
Twodogs
Gold Member
67
6
[Moderator's note: spin off from previous thread due to topic change.]

Reading here that in QM it is not possible to explicitly define path, yet it seems in the everyday world that path can be sufficiently defined so as to land a rover on Mars. Is that ultimately illusory or is there a point of demarcation between the realms. Disregard if is this is off topic. Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The Mars rover is a many-body system, and "many" here means really "many"! Note that 12g carbon is about 1mol consisting of about ##6 \cdot 10^{23}## ##^{12}\text{C}## atoms.

Of course you cannot solve the quantum many-body problem for all these particles in minute detail using quantum mechanics or even relativistic quantum field theory to also describe the atomic nuclei as bound states of quarks and gluons, etc.

To handle the Mars rover you need an effective theory for the relevant, macroscopic degrees of freedom, which are a only a few, i.e., you can coarse grain the detailed dynamics tremendously. After all you end up with classical Newtonian mechanics for a body moving in the (also Newtonian) gravitational field of the Sun and the planets of our solar system.

There's no contradiction between the classical theories of physics, which are approximations of the fundamental physics adequate for a pretty large realm of applicability, including "rocket science" :-).
 
  • #3
vanhees71 said:
The Mars rover is a many-body system, and "many" here means really "many"! Note that 12g carbon is about 1mol consisting of about ##6 \cdot 10^{23}## ##^{12}\text{C}## atoms.

Of course you cannot solve the quantum many-body problem for all these particles in minute detail using quantum mechanics or even relativistic quantum field theory to also describe the atomic nuclei as bound states of quarks and gluons, etc.

To handle the Mars rover you need an effective theory for the relevant, macroscopic degrees of freedom, which are a only a few, i.e., you can coarse grain the detailed dynamics tremendously. After all you end up with classical Newtonian mechanics for a body moving in the (also Newtonian) gravitational field of the Sun and the planets of our solar system.

There's no contradiction between the classical theories of physics, which are approximations of the fundamental physics adequate for a pretty large realm of applicability, including "rocket science" :-).
Thanks.
I watched a tutorial in which a post doc worked through the math suggesting that there is a mass/energy bound to the quantum realm. By his reckoning, a speck of dust floating in a light breeze is outside the quantum realm by twenty orders of magnitude. Not sure I have expressed it clearly here, but wonder if there is an approximate demarcation - classical/quantum.
 
  • #4
Twodogs said:
wonder if there is an approximate demarcation - classical/quantum.
Typically, systems with 10000 to a million atoms are in the grey zone in between. But it depends on the accuracy with which you want to model things.
 
  • #5
Hm, wait for ever better experiments :-).
 
  • #6
Point of demarcation? You mean a spot where om one side behavior is purely classical and on the other purely quantum? There is no such point.

Further, some systems never become purely classical. You cannot understand the specific heats of metals with classical electron behavior. The fact that you can buy an oven mitt at all is proof of quantum mechanics.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, vanhees71 and dextercioby
  • #7
Vanadium 50 said:
The fact that you can buy an oven mitt at all is proof of quantum mechanics.
Can you elaborate a bit, why is QM necessary to understand how oven mitt works?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #8
Demystifier said:
Can you elaborate a bit, why is QM necessary to understand how oven mitt works?
I thought that buy was the operative word. I.e. that somehow the success of global capitalism was proof of QM.
 
  • Haha
Likes Demystifier and Frabjous
  • #9
Classically, the specific heat of metals is very high, so it would take many hours or days for a cookie tray to heat up. No need for an oven mitt after 30 minutres - you could just grab it. (Further, if it did heat up, there would be so much heat present that the nearby area would become an oven and the mitt would be useless)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
Classically, the specific heat of metals is very high, so it would take many hours or days for a cookie tray to heat up. No need for an oven mitt after 30 minutres - you could just grab it. (Further, if it did heat up, there would be so much heat present that the nearby area would become an oven and the mitt would be useless)
Nevertheless, engineers use successfully classical physics to describe the thermodynmaical and elastic properties of metals. The prediction of material properties requires quantum physics, but not the macroscopic consequences of these properties.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, PeroK and gentzen
  • #11
So?

My point is that there is no point in which the specific heat of metals is anywhere near its classical limit. There is no "point of demarcation".
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #12
Vanadium 50 said:
So?
My point is that there are different possible interpretations of what a quantum/classical boundary means, and one of them has a meaningful though somewhat fuzzy answer. So it is likely that the OP meant that.
 
  • #13
The funny thing is that in a way both points of view are right. You can of course describe the thermodynamics of a piece of metal classically taking the specific heat simply as an empirical input ("phenomenological thermodynamics").

On the other hand it's true that the failure of the classical Drude model to explain the deviation from the Dulong-Petite prediction for the contribution of the "free electrons" (conduction electrons) to the heat capacity:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_electron_model

At room temperature you can usually neglect the contribution from the conduction electrons due to quantum degeneracy and are left with the Dulong-Petit value from the lattice vibrations alone, ##3Nk##:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dulong–Petit_law

The explanation for this discrepancy to the classical Drude model is one of the earliest application of Fermi statistics and is due to Sommerfeld, extending the classical model to the Drude-Sommerfeld model.

I guess that's what @Vanadium 50 is referring to.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes hutchphd, Vanadium 50 and PeroK

FAQ: Point of Demarcation between Quantum and Classical Behavior

What is the point of demarcation between quantum and classical behavior?

The point of demarcation between quantum and classical behavior is not a single, well-defined boundary but rather a gradual transition. It is typically characterized by the scale of the system—quantum effects dominate at atomic and subatomic scales, while classical physics provides accurate descriptions at macroscopic scales. Decoherence, where quantum superpositions break down into classical probabilities due to interactions with the environment, is a key mechanism in this transition.

How does decoherence contribute to the transition from quantum to classical behavior?

Decoherence occurs when a quantum system interacts with its environment, causing the system to lose its quantum coherence. This process effectively suppresses interference effects and forces the system to behave more classically. As a result, the distinct quantum states become mixed and the system appears to follow classical probabilistic rules, facilitating the transition from quantum to classical behavior.

Can macroscopic objects exhibit quantum behavior?

In principle, macroscopic objects can exhibit quantum behavior, but in practice, it is extremely difficult to observe due to rapid decoherence. Experiments with systems like superconducting circuits and Bose-Einstein condensates have demonstrated quantum effects on larger scales, but maintaining coherence in macroscopic objects requires highly controlled environments to minimize interactions with the surroundings.

What role does the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle play in distinguishing quantum from classical behavior?

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that certain pairs of physical properties, like position and momentum, cannot be simultaneously measured with arbitrary precision. This principle is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics and has no counterpart in classical physics, where such properties can be measured precisely. The uncertainty principle highlights the intrinsic limitations of measurements at the quantum level, distinguishing quantum behavior from classical predictability.

How does the correspondence principle relate to the transition between quantum and classical physics?

The correspondence principle, formulated by Niels Bohr, states that the behavior of quantum systems must converge to classical physics predictions in the limit of large quantum numbers or large scales. This principle ensures that quantum mechanics is consistent with classical mechanics in regimes where classical physics is known to be valid, thus providing a smooth transition between the two domains as the scale of the system increases.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
65
Views
8K
Replies
13
Views
849
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top