Points of constructive and destructive interference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating points of constructive and destructive interference from two in-phase sound sources separated by a distance of 2.0 lambda. It is established that there are 8 points of maximum signal (constructive interference) around the sources, derived from the phase difference equation. For destructive interference, participants suggest using concentric circles to visualize the patterns, indicating that similar methods can be applied to find the points of minimum signal. The conversation also encourages using drawing tools or animations to better understand the interference patterns. Overall, the exploration of these concepts emphasizes the relationship between source separation and interference patterns.
AndreAo
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two point sources of sound waves of identical wavelength lambda and amplitude are separated by distance D = 2.0lambda. The sources are in phase. (a) How many points of maximum signal (constructive interference) lie along a large circle around the sources? (b) How many points of minimum signal (destructive interference)?

Homework Equations


\phi = \Deltad/\lambda*2\pi
where \Deltad is the difference of distance between the two sources and the receptor.
\lambda is the wavelength
\phi is the phase difference

The Attempt at a Solution


To occur constructive interference \phi have to be a 2\pim, where m\inN. Using this fact:
2\pim = \Deltad/\lambda*2\pi
m = \Deltad/\lambda
\Deltad = m\lambda
For m = 0, we have a straight passing between the two sources, so it will hit this circle in two points,if m = 1..n , we have points in the side of the two fonts that will hit the circle, again just two points. But the answer is 8 points. Can I say that it would have the same quantity of points for destructive interference too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you haven't already done it in high school, I suggest you dig out a compass and draw a series of concentric circles with radii 1 cm, 2 cm, 3 cm, and 4 cm to represent the crests from one source with wavelength 1 cm. Start again 2 cm away from the first source and draw the concentric circles again. Points where the crests intersect are points on the constructive interference lines. Draw the lines of constructive interference - you will see there are 8 of them all right. If you don't have a compass, use this animation:
http://id.mind.net/~zona/mstm/physics/waves/interference/twoSource/TwoSourceInterference1.html
For the destructive interference pattern you must draw circles with radii of .5, 1.5, 2.5, etc. in a different colour to represent the troughs of the waves. Mark the spots where a trough meets a crest to see the pattern of destructive interference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't draw it before, but I think this isn't the way to solve if a can find the locus of that points. Thanks for answering.
 
Even more fun to draw it in a computer Draw program so you can group the crests and troughs from each source together and move them relative to each other so you can see the patterns for separations of 1λ, 1.5λ, etc. Once you have done a few, you will see the pattern and can write down a simple formula for the number of constructive interference lines given the separation of the sources.

I'll be interested in seeing your more sophisticated solution!
 
I've found the solution for it, but I'll not reproduce in the answer: http://www.fisica.ufs.br/CorpoDocente/egsantana/ondas/interferencia/Interferencia.html , it's in portuguese.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top